As long as you attribute enjoying your husband's death as reasonable, then Coulter's arguments could be so construed. She is an embarrassment to what used to be conservative causes. She makes many misstatements of evolutionary theory; these misstatements have been corrected long before she decided to misuse them again. There is no excuse for such actions (well, maybe Molly Ivins has an excuse.)
Good morning, Doc!
Actually Doc, I don't think Ann's comments re: the "Jersey Girls" were all that over the top. Like Cindy Sheehan, they have benefitted from the death of a loved one (and Sheehan's son was a very honorable man who, were he still living, would most likely deplore his mother's mindless, anti-American antics), and took the opportunity of their widowhood to engage in hard-left political activism. Ann's angrument that their widow status is supposed to make them polemically bullet-proof is dead-on. I think most of the hand-ringing over Ann's comments is just so much hypocrisy on the part of the nattering ninny class.
If she is misstating evolutionary theory even though such "mistakes" have been corrected before, Wow, Ann must be really dumb. But somehow, I don't think so.
Maybe it's time to "correct" such statements again? You want to start?