Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN
The debate here is not science verses non-science. The debate is over the interpretation of scientific evidence and whether or not it really supports one theory over the other.

On these threads the debate is science vs. religion.

The debates over the interpretation of scientific evidence take place in technical journals and scientific conferences, not on FR.

124 posted on 08/17/2006 6:35:32 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

"On these threads the debate is science vs. religion."

I hope you really don't mean that. As you probably already know many of the great men of science such as Galileo, Newton, Descartes were also great men of faith. Most of the people on this thread who talk about Creationism or ID as science are really being quite silly. It bothers me, as a conservative, and as a person of faith that somehow I have to choose between faith and science. I choose to support both. It is most upsetting that some people take pleasure in suggesting that 77% of Republicans don't believe in evolution. More than upsetting it is shameful and I refuse to believe it is a legitimate survey.


133 posted on 08/17/2006 6:50:29 PM PDT by spatso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson