Replies

Oh please, use big words. Begin by explaining how the crime of (possible) arson is mitigated by the religious preference of the victims, and the fact that it results in no injuries. Let's test your idea of moral mathematics.

I was responding to this statement: "In my opinion, any comments suggesting that it's a good idea to burn down Islamic centers or mosques should be removed from the thread. That attitude is reducing ourselves to the same level as radical Muslims."

IMHO, it's a long way down to "their level". I was saying that lighting fires is not as bad as the acts of violence we continually see committed against non-Muslims by Muslims. You disagree.

"Begin by explaining how the crime of (possible) arson is mitigated by the religious preference of the victims"

It all revolves around what you think of islam. I don't believe it to be a religion, I believe it to be a death cult. muslims have sworn to be our enemy. Six years ago I knew nothing of islam or muslims or moslems or mohammedians, or who the heck mohammed was. Now I know all too well. I have no problem with Amish, or Hindu, or Shinto, or Buddist, or Catholic... etc. But, as far as I know, none of those religions have books that are a combined politcal system/religion that outlines how to overwhelm and kill non believers. Everyone agrees... muslims, politicians, police forces, intelligence people, everyone... that there are terrorist cells here in the US waiting to act, and those cells are... *gasp* muslim.

If muslims feel unwelcome in the US, I have no problem with that.