You are acting as if all Muslims are terrorists (or terrorist-sympathizers). I know one who is not. I am uncertain how to proceed under the Federal Rules of Evidence, so take your "concern" about anecdotal evidence and shove it. Nothing I can do will convince you otherwise.
No I am acting like most RADICAL Muslims are terrorists or potential terrorists. I never said anything about the members of the mosque. When terrorists target "infidels", they do not bother to check to see if they voted for Bush or if they are Jewish, they kill whoever happens to be around. The alleged or imagined arsonist in this case is making the same mistake, theoretically, but it does not appear that the primary intent was to KILL. That is why I say they are not morally equivalent. Sorry that you had to get nasty rather than bother to read and try to understand.