Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/17/2006 9:25:07 AM PDT by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: slowhand520

Judge: Wiretap Program Unconstitutional
By SARAH KARUSH, Associated Press Writer

Thursday, August 17, 2006


A federal judge ruled Thursday that the government's warrantless wiretapping program is unconstitutional and ordered an immediate halt to it.


U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit became the first judge to strike down the National Security Agency's program, which she says violates the rights to free speech and privacy.


The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it difficult for them to do their jobs. They believe many of their overseas contacts are likely targets of the program, which involves secretly taping conversations between people in the U.S. and people in other countries.


The government argued that the program is well within the president's authority, but said proving that would require revealing state secrets.


The ACLU said the state-secrets argument was irrelevant because the Bush administration already had publicly revealed enough information about the program for Taylor to rule.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/08/17/national/a090059D26.DTL

Check it out:

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060807/NEWS05/608070381/1001/NEWS&template=printart


2 posted on 08/17/2006 9:26:48 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Talk to those who kill their own children, by Jihad/PR ? Remember Beslan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

"violates the rights to free speech and privacy."

If that is the case then this ruling is on life support :-)


3 posted on 08/17/2006 9:28:23 AM PDT by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

Another reason to keep such programs secret. No court challenges would come up.

It is a given that members of the media are in direct communication (not always BUT they DO communicate) with Al Qaeda. Time Magazine has such a reporter (from Australia).

They don't want to be brought up as working with the enemy.

When you factor in Peter Jennings and Mike Wallace's comments on "reporting from the enemy side", you can see why they claim "free speech" and privacy)


4 posted on 08/17/2006 9:28:45 AM PDT by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1685303/posts


6 posted on 08/17/2006 9:30:04 AM PDT by Petruchio (* Censored *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

In 1979, three years after she campaigned for Jimmy Carter's presidential bid, Carter rewarded Taylor with a lifetime appointment to U.S. District Court in Detroit.


7 posted on 08/17/2006 9:30:09 AM PDT by Ben Mugged (Why is it that our children can't read a Bible in school, but they can in prison?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

Interested in Opposing Today's ACLU NSA Lawsuit? . . .
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2006/01/interested_in_t.html


9 posted on 08/17/2006 9:30:21 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Talk to those who kill their own children, by Jihad/PR ? Remember Beslan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

Hmmmmm.... an African-American Democrat woman judge who helped get Jimmy Carter into office.

I'll stick with the FISA Judges, thank you!

"FISA judges say Bush within law"

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20060329-120346-1901r.htm



10 posted on 08/17/2006 9:30:52 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

This was already on Rush, and on FR. It will come to nothing.


11 posted on 08/17/2006 9:31:09 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

Bush needs to make examples of these nitwit judges by exposing them. Background, party affiliation, etc. Hopefully the SC will overturn. Otherwise what army does this judge have to enforce her dumb decision? Maybe it is time to ignore these judges. It's obvious this judge has no understanding of the Constitution.


12 posted on 08/17/2006 9:31:29 AM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

Posted:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1685294/posts?page=1


13 posted on 08/17/2006 9:31:32 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Talk to those who kill their own children, by Jihad/PR ? Remember Beslan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

This is one time the Executive needs to ignore a ruling by the Judiciary. The President is the sole person authorized to conduct war and this is a war!


14 posted on 08/17/2006 9:32:04 AM PDT by borisbob69 (Old shade is better than new shade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520
Her highness, U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor, is going to get a rude awakening when she comes to realize that the United States isn't a monarchy. She can order till she's blue in the face.
15 posted on 08/17/2006 9:32:09 AM PDT by TChris (Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

You Can't Connect the Dots?
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/004297.htm


19 posted on 08/17/2006 9:33:54 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Talk to those who kill their own children, by Jihad/PR ? Remember Beslan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520
The government argued that the program is well within the president's authority, but said proving that would require revealing state secrets.

That's lame. The administration already wrote up a great Constitutional case (no secrets needed at all) a few years ago. Not using that tells me that the government didn't care if they won or lost this case.

23 posted on 08/17/2006 9:37:01 AM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

She is a District judge, not the high Supreme Judge of all the USA. She has no authority in this case.
Ignore this creature.


24 posted on 08/17/2006 9:38:34 AM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520; Forrestfire; Ben Mugged; avacado
"A federal judge ruled Thursday that the government's warrantless wiretapping program is unconstitutional and ordered an immediate halt to it.

U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit became the first judge to strike down the National Security Agency's program, which she says violates the rights to free speech and privacy. "

Liberal, black, Carter appointee, and senile (75 years old), Class of '54.

"Anna Diggs Taylor

In 1979, Anna Diggs Taylor became the first black woman judge to be appointed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan."

26 posted on 08/17/2006 9:59:45 AM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520

I question the timing...


27 posted on 08/17/2006 10:08:35 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: slowhand520
U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor is a danger to the American people. She should be removed from the bench immediately, tried, convicted and dealt the harshest of punishments available under our system of laws.

There can be no doubt that she is a conscious agent of AlQaida.

29 posted on 08/17/2006 2:00:42 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson