Are you saying you agree with me then? If not, then why are you questioning posts you disagree with? The answer - I disagreed with his legal analysis BEFORE I found out he only played a constitutional attorney on televsion.
Read post #1 though #100 - you will find 100 constitutional opinions in those posts, yet since they echo what you are in favor of then their qualifications don't matter.
Even now, most are still assuming that it applies to all wire taps and not just warrantless ones.