[RustMartialis]

"Some of us prefer to agree with Patrick Henry on the tradeoff of liberty for personal safety.

What personal liberties have YOU had to sacrifice?

I'd bet NONE!!"

So you'd be all okay with President Hillary invoking executive powers to take your guns away, since she'd be C-in-C.

I mean, if the GOVUSA can ignore the 1st and 4th Amendments, what's the 2nd in addition?

Ignoring *anyone's* Constitutional rights impacts *everyone's* rights. But evidently you're "ok" with giving up your rights when the Govermnent asks.

--R.

[sinkspur]

I mean, if the GOVUSA can ignore the 1st and 4th Amendments, what's the 2nd in addition?

Foreign terrorists don't get the protection of either the 1st or the 4th amendments. You and this dopey judge do.

She will be overruled, likely by having her silly order stayed until the 6th Circuit can formally overrule her, within 24 hours.

[Miss Marple]

President Hillary will do what she damn pleases, regardless of whether this is overturned or not. We have the track record of her husband's administration to demonstrate this. They will do as they please, ignore Congress and the courts, and the media will applaud them as "thinking outside the box."

To deny the President this program, IN A TIME OF WAR WHEN THE NATION IS IN GRAVE DANGER, in order to foolishly think that it will keep Hillary from doing anything, is just plain stupid. Liberals only go with court decisions when it favors them.

Personally, I would like to know who this judge has been in contact with, I would like her bank account audited, and hopefully I would like a bill of impeachment brought before the House.