Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Senate approves redistricting after wider reform effort fails
AP - Contra Costa Times ^ | Aug. 16, 2006 | DON THOMPSON

Posted on 08/16/2006 5:38:26 PM PDT by calcowgirl

SACRAMENTO - The state Senate on Wednesday approved a bill that would force lawmakers to relinquish the power to draw their own districts, a day after legislative leaders abandoned efforts to link redistricting and term-limit reform for the November ballot.

Despite the bill's passage in one house, its fate in the Assembly was uncertain. Even if eventually passed by both chambers, the proposed constitutional amendment is a longshot for the fall election. Friday is the deadline for the Legislature to place measures on the ballot.

"It's not going to be on this year's ballot," said Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, who supports the proposal but favors a two-year delay. "Our time has expired this year."

Lawmakers draw their own legislative districts each decade after the new census. That lets them create safe Democratic and Republican districts, a situation that critics say reduces competition and adds to partisan divide in the Legislature.

The Senate's 27-11 bipartisan vote surprised even supporters, who feared redistricting changes were dead for the year. On Tuesday, legislative leaders ended a last-minute attempt to craft a bill linking redistricting reform to changes in lawmakers' term limits.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger criticized the collapse of that effort, but on Wednesday praised passage of the bill by Sen. Alan Lowenthal, D-Long Beach. The governor called for immediate Assembly action to end "an obvious conflict of interest."

Lowenthal said the vote is the first time in the nation that a legislative body has voted to give up its redistricting power.

"This is an historic vote," said Sen. Roy Ashburn, R-Bakersfield, the bill's co-author. It would "give to the people the authority and the power that should rightfully be theirs ... rather than having the politicians pick the voters."

The bill would shift the drawing of new legislative districts to an 11-member commission primarily selected by legislative leaders. Significant opposition remains over a provision requiring retired judges - who are mostly white males - to screen the pool of candidates for the Legislature.

Perata said that provision would have to be altered in the Assembly, which would hold hearings and send the amended measure back to the Senate for final approval. All that would have to happen by week's end to meet the ballot deadline.

Lowenthal and Ashburn said they will push for quick Assembly action.

"Whether it's on the 2006 or 2008 ballot, it has to get out of the Legislature this year," Lowenthal said. "If we lose this momentum, it may never happen again."

ON THE NET

Read SCA3 at http://www.sen.ca.gov


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: alanlowenthal; california; callegislation; elections; redistricting; royashburn; sca3

1 posted on 08/16/2006 5:38:27 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Ashburn Redistricting Measure Passes Senate

Legislative boundaries bill now in the hands of the Assembly

SACRAMENTO – Senator Roy Ashburn (R–Bakersfield) today announced that the Senate passed his redistricting Constitutional Amendment, SCA 3 by a vote of 27-11. Ashburn is joint-author of the measure along with Senator Alan Lowenthal (D–Long Beach).

During debate on the measure fourteen different Senators rose to speak on the importance of redistricting and the potential impact on California’s future.

“This is a momentous occasion in history, in that a legislative body has voted to reduce its own power in the interest of good governance,” said Senator Ashburn.
SCA 3 creates an independent redistricting commission to establish and adopt plans for state Assembly, Senate, Board of Equalization, and Congressional districts. The plan must follow specified criteria in compliance with the U.S. Constitution and the Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, and maintain and respect communities of interest.

“This is a fundamental political reform that is needed and whose time has finally arrived,” Ashburn added. “As a result of the special election last year, the public’s focus on the role that incumbent politicians play in drawing their own districts is now well known. The people of California are hungry for a change.”

If SCA 3 passes the Assembly before the end of the current legislative session Aug 31st, the measure could still be placed on the November General Election ballot, subject to legislative approval of a supplemental ballot pamphlet.

Senator Ashburn represents the 18th Senate District including Tulare, Kern, Inyo, and San Bernardino Counties.


2 posted on 08/16/2006 5:41:10 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
This is an historic vote," said Sen. Roy Ashburn, R-Bakersfield, the bill's co-author.

Idiot reporter. He and Lowenthal are JOINT authors. There's a big difference

3 posted on 08/16/2006 5:42:24 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
The bill has a traditional mix of authorities.

Approval of the electorate is required to adopt the process.

The judicial selects the nominees for the commission.

Elected officials appoint the members of the commissions.

Any decision of the commission requires the approval of the judicial.

4 posted on 08/16/2006 6:05:41 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
I would prefer moving the process over to a series of independent boundary commissions like in Canada. Anything will be better than gerrymandering to serve the interests of the party in power.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)

5 posted on 08/16/2006 8:04:03 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson