Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Nuclear Blast At Port Could Kill 60,000
CBS ^ | Aug 16, 2006 8:22 am US/Pacific

Posted on 08/16/2006 11:54:53 AM PDT by BenLurkin

SANTA MONICA, Calif. A nuclear blast at the Port of Long Beach could kill 60,000 people, expose 150,000 to radiation, send 6 million people fleeing and cause 10 times the economic losses attributed to 9/11, according to the Rand Corp.

Those projections are based on a scenario that assumes terrorists detonate a 10-kiloton nuclear bomb hidden in a shipping container shortly after it is unloaded at a Port of Long Beach pier.

"We used this scenario because analysts consider it feasible," said a summary of the report, which was an amplification of a study that the Santa Monica-based think tank conducted for the Department of Homeland Security in 2004.

But Rand officials said the study was not meant to predict such an attack was likely.

Based on the nuclear-blast scenario, Rand researchers conducted "strategic games" with leaders from government, business, and the insurance and real estate industries, according to Rand.

"Participants shared their perspectives on what the attack's longer-term consequences might be and outlined the decisions they would be likely to make in response to the sequence of events our scenario analysis suggested," the study said.

"They also anticipated the decision-making challenges that might arise and reflected on strategies that might address these problems."

The attack assumed by Rand researchers could prove overwhelming in the short-term and beyond. Within 72 hours, according to the study, the explosion would "devastate a vast portion of the Los Angeles metropolitan area," including a port complex that handles about a third of the nation's imports.


TOPICS: US: California; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: globaljihad; jihadinamerica; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: BenLurkin

This could be why the Globalist are trying to move the major ports down into Mexico.


41 posted on 08/16/2006 1:23:29 PM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Hmm, isn't the port run by a foreign corporation? This will be the other shoe of this propaganda campaign, unless it's Hutchins-Whampoa or Lippo.


42 posted on 08/16/2006 1:24:56 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
And the down side is?

I live nearby.

43 posted on 08/16/2006 2:23:58 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That's odd. I have been having the strangest premonitions that Al Qaida and Friends were going to detonate a nuke in Long Beach this week or the next.

I had one last night at Church too, weird reading this today.


44 posted on 08/16/2006 2:25:06 PM PDT by Smogger (It's the WOT Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergio
I know it's just a joke, but 60,000 lost lives is 60,000 too many be they conservative or liberal.

I suppose in God's eyes, both lives have the same value.

But God doesn't have to put up with liberals.

45 posted on 08/16/2006 2:28:42 PM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: hoosierboy

"Thank you CBS for giving terrorists an Idea."

Just doing their job.
Because heaven knows, supporting the USA and just reporting real
news ain't.


46 posted on 08/16/2006 2:41:28 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I'm no expert and I invite you to please provide links to sources if I am wrong...but:

North Korea can't get a big enough payload over here yet to support a 2 megaton burst.

In fact -- there is no reason to believe that there arsenal includes any 2 megaton warheads.
47 posted on 08/16/2006 3:17:00 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Won't happen.

The Islamofacists aren't stupid. There are not enough Americans left in LA to create a real sense of terror in the US population.

The most likely effect would be that Mexico would lodge a strong protest with the Bush administration because Mexico's imports of US currency would plunge.

48 posted on 08/16/2006 4:32:33 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Whatever.


49 posted on 08/16/2006 4:36:02 PM PDT by verity (The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Why did it take this long for Rand to figure this out? This is old news and doesn't deserve space in a newspaper. Obviously, the POLB/LA is one of the top 5 terrorist targets in the U.S. There have been arrests made in the past several months by Homeland Security regarding suspicious activity in and around the port. Do we need to read about this in the papers? No!


50 posted on 08/16/2006 4:46:40 PM PDT by doctor noe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

A 10 Ton NUKE going off anywhere can't be too good for us!


51 posted on 08/16/2006 5:54:45 PM PDT by Sam Ketcham (Amnesty means vote dilution, widespread taxes to bring them UP to the Poverty Level!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doctor noe
Good question.

I'm guessing that there were tax dollars to spend and so they took them

The excuse probably was the involvement of local agencies in the 'thought exercise'.

Probably not a bad idea -- as part of regional planning for such a continency.
52 posted on 08/16/2006 7:47:24 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: All

Was the point of the story to push for all containers to be searched... a waste of time...once the nuke/container is in port it will go off...we won't have time to search for it.


53 posted on 08/16/2006 10:40:37 PM PDT by DHerion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson