Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DeLay Seat Turns into Fiasco
GOPUSA ^ | August 16, 2006 | Bobby Eberle

Posted on 08/16/2006 11:24:54 AM PDT by Columbine

In a recent speech, I told the audience about the political landscape of the 2006 elections. It’s going to be much tougher for Republicans than in recent election cycles. As a political party, we must have our act together in order to be successful. Unfortunately, that task has become tougher. The congressional seat of former Majority Leader Tom DeLay is now in jeopardy thanks in part to a failure in leadership from party officials.

Following a primary election victory, Rep. DeLay decided, through the advice of party officials, that because of the media circus that was surrounding his pending court case and other factors, the road to reelection would be tough. His opponent, former Rep. Nick Lampson, is very well funded, and has enlisted the support of Hollywood liberals and far-left organizations to help him win the seat.

In order to give the best possible opportunity to a new Republican candidate, a plan was put into place, undoubtedly under the guidance of party officials, whereby DeLay would move to Virginia, and thus be ineligible to run for a Texas congressional seat. Following Texas state law, a process would then unfold in which a new Republican nominee would be chosen to face Lampson. Sounds good on paper, right? However, the process quickly bogged down, and with no leadership or statewide/national media message the case disappeared into the courts with disastrous results.

(Excerpt) Read more at gopusa.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2006election; activistjudge; congress; court; delay; delaybashing; election2006; electioncongress; getdelay; houston; howtostealanelection; judicialtyranny; rattricks; republican; sugarland; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 08/16/2006 11:24:56 AM PDT by Columbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Columbine
now in jeopardy thanks in part to a failure in leadership from party officials

Score one for The Stupid Party. Democrats don't make these kind of boners. They lie, cheat, and break the law in order to get their campaigns in place.

2 posted on 08/16/2006 11:27:17 AM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Columbine

His opponent, former Rep. Nick Lampson, is very well funded, and has enlisted the support of Hollywood liberals and far-left organizations to help him win the seat.

That will realy play well in that district


3 posted on 08/16/2006 11:28:38 AM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Democrats don't make these kind of boners.

Sure they do. But then, as you said, they cheat. (See Torricelli, Robert)

4 posted on 08/16/2006 11:30:08 AM PDT by Coop (No, there are no @!%$&#*! polls on Irey vs. Murtha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid

Lampson propoganda commercials have already hit the airwaves.


5 posted on 08/16/2006 11:30:17 AM PDT by 38special (I mean come'on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Columbine
Lots of blame to go around in this mess:

Former Harris County Republican Party Chairman Gary Polland cites the Texas Republican Party leadership for its failure to properly have DeLay removed from the ballot. In the latest issue of his Texas Conservative Review, Polland enumerates what went wrong with the DeLay case. In particular, Polland notes:

– [Republican Party of Texas ] Chairman [Tina] Benkiser did not adequately prepare for or document DeLay’s change of residency when she removed his name. This was a chance where a little extra effort could have paid off. Instead it hurt them later when trying to prove DeLay’s ineligibility.

– RPT did not have their case together. In trial, the RPT’s arguments and witnesses came across as under-prepared. They made crucial mistakes that also limited their ability to make a stronger case on appeal.

– Moving to Federal Court was a monster mistake. RPT assumed that the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals would rule in our favor simply because they’re perceived as a Republican court. Instead, the RPT simply invited the federal government to intervene on a matter of state law. Not only was this a foolish move - it was decidedly not conservative. Conservatives respect our system of federalism and the rights and laws of the states

6 posted on 08/16/2006 11:30:53 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Columbine

The Liberal Party establishment didn't want the conservative Hammer to stay in the House.

They kicked him out.

They lose this seat it's their damn fault, and I'm not shedding a tear for them or the "sensitive morally upright beltway elitist conservatives" that joined the bash Delay bandwagon. Yes, I'm pointing at NR here...


7 posted on 08/16/2006 11:32:21 AM PDT by Soul Seeker (Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Columbine
Place the blame on the activist judges who have paved the way for the Dems to take over Congress by nixing the GOP's candidate in the Texas 22nd.
8 posted on 08/16/2006 11:33:54 AM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop

The Torch situation was also much, much worse. The NJ law was in place with a late deadline in order to prevent the costly reprinting of ballots, not some sort of weird "good government" measure.


9 posted on 08/16/2006 11:36:06 AM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Columbine

I never understood why DeLay dropped out of the race in the first place. The "money laundering" case against him was unraveling, and there was evidence of the prosecuter jury shopping just to get any sort of indictment in part because a documentary was being filmed about the prosecuter.

What came out of the closet to bite the Hammer so badly that he ran away from a fight?


10 posted on 08/16/2006 11:36:13 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Gary Polland apparently doesn't know what he's talking about. They went to the Federal courts because they were arguing a Federal issue.

Or maybe he just has an axe to grind.


11 posted on 08/16/2006 11:38:01 AM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
The Democrats are always able to find a new candidate and put them on the ballot. They even have allowed voters to vote for a man (Missouri) who was dead and then put his wife in office, who no-one had voted for.

laws and rules only apply to the GOP

12 posted on 08/16/2006 11:41:04 AM PDT by GeronL (flogerloon.blogspot.com -------------> Rise of the Hate Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Same reason Bush and Rove pressured Sen Fitzgerald of Illinois to quit his seat. They were afraid he "might" lose, so they put in someone who did lose. To Osama Obama, of all people. Dick Marcinko would call that a real goatrope.

I think Rove is a greatly overrated intellect. Lee Atwater must be wringing his hands over this clown show.

It's hard to believe either party will win this fall. When someone like Lieberman can't go through the motions to turn out his supporters, you know things are run by incompetents.


13 posted on 08/16/2006 11:44:37 AM PDT by spudsmaki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid

"really play well in that district" I assume your tong is placed firmly in the teeth. With out the lawsuit the Rats would not have prevailed. Yes it was botched, yes DeLay could have and should have run and won. However we have been dealt a hand we must win and If we have to draw to a straight flush then deal the cards.


14 posted on 08/16/2006 11:44:53 AM PDT by gumboyaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I still think it was the "money laundering" case that did DeLay in because he's now "indicted Congressman Tom DeLay" no matter how corrupt Earle is. There are some who say that it's the Abramoff scandal, but (a) I don't know what DeLay did, other than knowing Abramoff by name and (b) it is really not going anywhere.

The bottom line is that Tom's poll numbers were too low and that's really all that matters.


15 posted on 08/16/2006 11:46:54 AM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

The write-in campaigns are just rehearsals for next year. Should Lampson win, we should knock him out in the 2008 Presidential Year. Provided we stay focused on "Lampson Using the Courts to steal our seat" instead of slashing each other's throats in the primary.


16 posted on 08/16/2006 11:49:11 AM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
When the court ruled against DeLay's replacement and Delay still stayed out of the race, his argument that he withdrew to increase the odds of the Republicans retaining the seat were shown to be false.
17 posted on 08/16/2006 12:08:02 PM PDT by conejo99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Coop

It is hard to compare Torricelli and Delay because one was a Senator, and one was a Representative. However, I believe that the constitution overrides laws designed solely to save time and money for the SOS office of that state. Everyone is equally entitled to representation. Torricelli should have been removed from the NJ ballot, as Delay should be removed from the TX-22 ballot.


18 posted on 08/16/2006 12:16:35 PM PDT by Prodn2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Columbine
The problem was that Delay got cute, and decided to win the primary and then drop out, rather than dropping out of the primary. So I blame Delay.

I don't agree with the article. The GOP case was a loser from the getgo because one isn't disqualified from the ballot under Texas law unless one is not a resident on election day, and there is no way to know that until election day. Thus the factual details don't matter.

19 posted on 08/16/2006 12:29:08 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
Not yet, we can win this thing. There will be no straight party vote and every block must be checked. 22 will have a blank space next to repub. check this spot and system will allow to dial in name of write in. With a 60% Repub.constituency a great effort could just do it. Also the dems voters just might not have what it takes to show up. Lamson is an interloper with no strong local support.
20 posted on 08/16/2006 12:29:57 PM PDT by gumboyaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson