Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BRIT BABY BOMB BEASTS
New York Post ^ | 8/16/06 | Andy Soltis

Posted on 08/16/2006 10:54:40 AM PDT by Argus

Twisted young British parents planned to sacrifice their precious baby in the evil cause of jihad by mass murder.

Fanatical terror suspect Abdula Ahmed Ali, 25, and his wife, Cossor, 23, are among those being interrogated by police as suspects in the massive plot to attack trans-Atlantic flights in midair.

What the outwardly normal couple had secretly plotted is almost too horrifying to consider, cops said.

The Alis planned to use 6-month-old son Zain's baby bottle as a liquid bomb, blowing themselves and their child up, along with hundreds of others aboard the flight.

(snip)

...British security experts suspect that Cossor Ali is an example of a chilling phenomenon that is growing in popularity among the terror set - a woman willing to use her innocent appearance to allay suspicions and carry out a suicide bombing. At least 20 Muslim women have blown themselves up in such attacks.

Particularly disturbing was Cossor Ali's apparent intent to conceal the liquid trigger for a bomb in Zain's baby bottle when the family boarded a jetliner.

"It may be beyond belief, but we are convinced that there are now women in Britain who are prepared to die with their babies for their twisted cause," a security adviser to the British government told The Times of London.

"They are ruthless, single-minded and totally committed."

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: islamicnazis; londonairlineplot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: dragonblustar

Sure, all male kids get 72 virgins.


61 posted on 08/16/2006 12:19:36 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd

You grossly overestimated.... Muslim mothers have been sending sons off to die in the name of their mental disease for thousands of years.

There is no moderation in Islam... it is a ends justifies the means warriors credo, not a religion of peace.

Islam believes it is destined to rule the world and advocates its followers to do everything in their power to make it so, and makes ABSOLUTELY NO DISTINCTION, NONE, ZIP, ZILCH, ZERO whether they do it by peaceful or violent means.


62 posted on 08/16/2006 12:37:11 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

"I for one am sick of making excuses for it. The problem is not moderate vs extremist Islam.. its ISLAM itself. It is a "religion" in which Deceit, Treachery and Murder are considered Morale... it is a "religion" that mandates itself to take over the world, and makes no distinction whether it does so by peaceful or violent means."

I think you're right. It's not about "moderate" vs. "extreme." Look what it says in the article...

"To their stunned friends and neighbors in a housing project in north London, the Alis were known as quiet, struggling parents and observant Muslims who showed no signs of terror ties."

So, these would probably have been considered "moderate" Muslims by most people, and this is what they tried to do. If this is "moderate", I really hope they never get "extreme"...


63 posted on 08/16/2006 12:48:10 PM PDT by cultivatepercipience (If Geneva applies to terrorists, do we get to shoot them as spies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: cultivatepercipience

Ive always told anyone who espouses the "moderate muslim" shpeil to me... there is no such thing.

The nice guy, who looks like hes friendly, popular, just one of the guys, whatever... just when he goes from being just Mo from around the block to Abu Ramzan or whatever, is anybodys guess.

Look at what people have said about each and every one of the bombers.. "I dont believe it", "Hed never do such a thing", "He was always so polite"... all bunkum. None of it matters if hes plotting to go kaboom.


64 posted on 08/16/2006 1:34:35 PM PDT by ketelone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Condor 63

Nukes may be the only viable option. However, a smart, gutsy, NON-PC military operation without nukes would go far to reduce/eliminate the threat. Daisy cutters and MOABs all 'round, fellas!


65 posted on 08/16/2006 2:49:32 PM PDT by delphirogatio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Argus

bump


66 posted on 08/16/2006 2:52:49 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson