See now why this hysteric "All Muslims are terrorists" doctrine of the Neo Isolationist is so utterly absurd?
I keep asking this question and as yet none of the Squeal Like Pigs choir in the Neo Isolationism movement can answer it.
If Islam is the problem, why are the bulk of the forces fighting, and doing the bulk of the dying, on our side Muslim Iraqis, Pakistanis and Afghanis? Any of you even bother for a heartbeat to consider the Kurds are Muslims?
So Neo Isolationists. How well did your support for your regional pet bully boys work out in stopping 09-11-01?
An utterly stupid, bigoted, absurd article by a less then room temperature intellect wholly unable to evolve beyond his arrogant childishly provincial 09-10-01 mindset.
What percentage of white males are violent sexual predators? What percentage of Muslims are terrorists? And most notably, what percentage of Muslims are terrorist sympathizers? Nobody wants to ask that question, it seems.
Not all those who claim the name Christian will go out on a missions trip or knock on doors to spread the gospel but those who strictly interpret the scriptures and follow what they read will. Same goes for Muslims, except they aren't called to just stop at knocking on doors they follow it up with bombs and bullets and saw off the heads of unbelievers on TV. Now in Iraq we see mostly Muslims bombing other Muslims because they believe the other group is apostate and even deeper are jealous of the power and wealth the one group has enjoyed, they think at the expense of the other. It almost reminds one of Ireland in the 80's and 90's except we know that those people were actually motivated by politics at the top. Here, politics are intricately entwined with religious fanaticism and there is no political solution on earth that can stop it.
"See now why this hysteric "All Muslims are terrorists" doctrine of the Neo Isolationist is so utterly absurd?"
False premise. No facts. Another rhetorical magic show.
If your question was "Do you *support* violent sexual predation" you would have something similar to the Pew survey which asserted to Muslims that "Violence against civilian targets in order to defend Islam can be justified."
The responses "sometimes/rarely" (and "rarely" does mean "yes") ranged from 20 to more than 50 percent when asked of Muslims in Europe and in Arab countries.
So it's fair to say that 20 to 50 percent of Muslims do in fact support terrorism against civilians to "defend Islam". Those are pretty high numbers no matter how you cut it.
Your citation of Muslims fighting Muslims is equally absurd.
This violent death cult has since its inception been just as willing to kill and terrorize Muslim blasphemers and heretics as it has been to slaughter Kuffar infidels.
Good Point.
I think there is a second element to terrorism that we are ignoring, Islam is a common thread but alone does not seem to be enough to drive people to insane acts of murder. As we know, thankfully, most Muslims don’t want to kill anyone, they just want to live their lives.
It appears to me that when Islam is combined with another radical ideology, fascisms in the case of Iran & Hezbollah, the two elements combined create the basis for slaughter.
In the UK or with Johnny Jihad Linch it was not fascists ideology that combined with Islam but leftists anti-American/Western hatred. The question is whether the majority of the radicalization was in a madrasa or a western university, probably a combination of both.
The beltway sniper and I guess the boys in Florida were black extremist.
I am not sure where I am going with this, it is easy to focus on the common element, Islam, but in the end that may not be our best strategy.