That's a bizarrely selective listing of study findings. Why not use the results from the full list of 708 studies I cited?
Bizarrely selective? Not at all.
It may not fit your notion of what a study should say about ETS but it's not bizarrely selective at all.
As for a rebuttal on all 708 studies you posted, that's gonna take a while. You sure you have the time to wait that long?
Why not pull up the relative risk numbers yourself and see how many show between 2.00 and 3.00?
As for this particular study, if you would care to post, or FReepmail me, the actual study, I would be appreciative.