Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mamzelle
Correct response.
68 posted on 08/16/2006 7:15:48 AM PDT by MrEdd (More cheep than a flock of baby chickens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: MrEdd
Actually, I am familiar with an attempted shakedown concerning intentional torts--a drug addict walks into a professional's place of business, and then runs out of the place of business yelling about how he's been beat up, assaulted.

He assembles phony pictures and sues the professional for assault. The professional contacts the insurance company and is panicked to realized that he is not covered.

The drug addict knew this--I guess his lawyer told him before the fact. He knew the chance of a quick settlement might be greater when the defendant discovers that he's going bare.

As it turned out, the insurance company did agree to pay for the defense, and the crooked junkie and his crooked lawyer agreed to a dismissal--but only after the faked photos entered into deposition.

What could be done to the lawyer in this case? The junkie had no assets.

70 posted on 08/16/2006 8:41:23 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson