I am not hardcore. I believe this guy deserves some compensation.
My point is that whether or not the guy is laying back waiting for an insurance payment he was an innocent victim of an accident cause by the insurers client. he deserves to be compensated and his vehicle should be repaired or replaced.
Its BS insurance companies getting away with this crap and juries letting them get away with it.
Since tort-case juries are so notorious for dishing out massive awards to the most questionable of plaintiffs, what caused this one to screw over a highly sympathetic victim? Makes you go "hmmmmmmmm", doesn't it?