To: Brilliant
His insurance company should have informed him of the law. He was holding out for a big payout and didn't win. Tough.
12 posted on
08/16/2006 4:24:38 AM PDT by
poobear
(Political Left, continually accusing their foes of what THEY themselves do every day.)
To: poobear
My suspicion is that it was the other guy's insurance company, but don't know.
To: poobear
Yes, it was. The article says so.
To: poobear; bvw; Young Scholar
Are you people off your rockers. He sued for payment of hi medical bills. He was hit by the insured, in other words the victim. I don't know why his company's insurance didn't cover his bills but it sounds like a screw job the whole way around. I can understand the insurance company not paying to repair his SUV which I assume would have gone to his estranged wife. I CANNOT understand how Progressive could refuse payment for treatment for the surviving son (assuming here), or the truck driver. I guess it is in the policy, but it still sucks.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson