Spriggina floundersi
Parvancorina minchami
yet-to-be published "soft-bodied trilobite"
Ann Coulter needs to avoid the creationist websites. They'll rot her brain.
It is interesting that Ms. Coulter points out in her book the problem with the "Cambrian explosion" where we have all this fossilized evidence of these complex organisms, but nothing pre-dating this period showing the change happening to get there.
Of course, this may be a loss in the fossil record and there is something that we have not found yet. But, was this not Darwin's main problem when he constructed his theory? And did he not believe that his theory would be vindicated when we had time to find these fossils, these missing links per se? If we have not, then haven't we just been looking at a version of evolution that is not what Darwin originally wrote about?
Not taking sides in the issue, just adding to the debate.
Spriggina floundersi
Parvancorina minchami
yet-to-be published "soft-bodied trilobite"
Ann Coulter needs to avoid the creationist websites. They'll rot her brain.