>>Coulter is scientifically illiterate. Read her new book. A friend's 15-year-old kid knows more science than she does.<<
"Science" is a broad field/term and, generally speaking, quite specialized. That is why one "anti-evo" poster was ridiculed here by darwiniacs for saying he was a "scientist". What "science" does your kid know (as opposed to "believe) more than Ann?
Post 11 was pure ad-himinem.
Biology. Ann spent a third of her new book making a fool of herself. Even high school kids are laughing at her ignorance of the biological sciences. (and it's not my kid, by the way).
Post 11 was pure ad-himinem.
You shouldn't use big words that you can't understand. Heck, you can't even spell it. An ad-hominem attack would have been if I was attacking taxesareforever on a personal level in post 11. I didn't. What I did do is make observations regarding the people that he was quoting. The ad-hominem attack was in taxesareforever's (and the usual cheerleaders) response to me.
Schlafly is a whiner. Her book "Safe, not Sorry" is a total "poor, poor me" whining rant about her not getting her way at a convention. It also contains a lot of man-hating feminism. I lost all respect for her after reading it.