"That's basically a conspiracy theory."
What, Global Warming? I think so. Grant money determining scientific results? No that's not just theory. My brother works in a lab where all decisions and even denial of experiment results are slanted to appease the grantors. He's seen this in many other labs he deals with. If you look closely at most GW science, you will see corruption, selective data and doctored results. More than ever, science has preconceived results affecting how experiments are set-up and controlled. The grant funding gravy train rules. Many scientists do not get grants unless they will produce the desired results. This has become an epidemic.
And where do the IDers get their money? I doubt James Leininger opens his checkbook unless he's sure what the result of any 'research' will be.
"If you look closely at most GW science, you will see corruption, selective data and doctored results. "
Yes, but that NEVER happens in any research related to evolution. I know this because many people on FR, including at least one scientist, have told me it's so.
Yeah, right. Talk about sticking your head in the sand.