Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bruno: A Stark contrast
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 8/15/6 | Debra J.Saunders

Posted on 08/15/2006 7:51:55 AM PDT by SmithL

ANY POLITICAL consultant will tell you there is little reason for an incumbent to debate a challenger. In a live forum, there is the remote chance an incumbent will say something that backfires, which is why some politicians won't debate unless they are in a competitive race and fear losing office. In 2004, Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, beat GOP challenger George Bruno with 72 percent of the vote to Bruno's 24 percent -- so you have to credit Stark for appearing at a League of Women Voters debate at Fremont's Comcast studios Thursday.

I showed up to see if Stark's infamous big mouth would run wild during the debate, which Comcast plans to air some time after Labor Day.

Allow me to report that viewers who tune into the debate will not see Stark unhinged. They will not see the congressman who in 1995 called moderate GOP Rep. Nancy Johnson of Connecticut "a whore for the insurance industry."

Viewers will not see the congressman who in 1990 called Health and Human Services Director Louis Sullivan, who is black, a "disgrace to his race." They also will not see the congressman who incorrectly asserted that the children of another African American, then GOP Rep. J.C. Watts, were all "born out of wedlock."

Viewers also will not see that model of decorum, who during a 2003 Ways and Means Committee debate, denounced the committee chairman as a "fascist" and called a fellow lawmaker "a fruitcake" as he challenged him to a fight.

They also won't see the man who greeted the news about the death of terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi by telling the Washington Times it was a stunt "to cover Bush's (rear) so he doesn't have to answer" for Iraqi civilians being killed.

I saw a civil exchange between two men

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: congress; election2006; electioncongress; fortney; georgebruno; petestark

1 posted on 08/15/2006 7:51:56 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Just on small quibble

>>ANY POLITICAL consultant will tell you there is little reason for an incumbent to debate a challenger.

There is little reason for a favourite to debate an underdog. This is not always the same thing. Just usually.


2 posted on 08/15/2006 7:59:01 AM PDT by qlangley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson