Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boundless
Silly question, but, why can't they go back to FILM cameras, and get the negatives to the regional news agency, and then scan them?

I know digital is easier, but negatives...

17 posted on 08/14/2006 8:16:21 AM PDT by akorahil (Thank You and God bless all Veterans. Truly, the real heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: akorahil

> ... why can't they go back to FILM cameras ...

Silver halide photography is nearly dead.
Before long, it will be used only by darkroom
nostalgics, along with daguerreotype.

Plus, negs have zero meta-data to bolster their
authenticity. A digital image from a secure
camera is much more credible than a neg.

Shoot your base scene with a 20Mp DSLR, edit
in Photoshop, print at high-res, re-shoot on
Ektachrome 400, and yer good to go.

The recent scandal was not really about technology
anyway. Some of those frauds were so blatent that
the only explanations are:
- massive editorial incompetence at Reuters
- massive agenda-driven corruption at Reuters

... well, maybe both.


21 posted on 08/14/2006 9:06:42 AM PDT by Boundless (Imagine if Fox had a news channel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson