Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Passport photograph of [5 year-ol] girl's bare shoulders rejected 'as it may offend (Guess who)'
The Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | August 14, 2006 | By Paul Stokes

Posted on 08/13/2006 7:29:23 PM PDT by aculeus

(Filed: 14/08/2006)

A five-year-old girl's passport application was rejected because her photograph showed her bare shoulders.

Hannah Edwards's mother, Jane, was told that the exposed skin might be considered offensive in a Muslim country.

The photograph was taken at a photo-booth at a local post office for a family trip to the south of France.

Because of the way the camera was set up, the picture came out showing Hannah's shoulders.

The family had it signed and presented it at a post office with the completed form but were told that it would not be accepted by the Passport Office.

A woman behind the counter informed them that she was aware of at least two other cases where applications had been rejected because a person's shoulders were not covered.

Mrs Edwards, a Sheffield GP, said: "I was incensed. I went back home and checked the form. Nowhere did it say anything about covering up shoulders. If it had, I would have done so, but it all seems so unnecessary.

"This is quite ridiculous, I followed the instructions on the passport form to the letter and it was still rejected. It is just officialdom pandering to political correctness.

"It is a total over-reaction. How can the shoulders of a five-year-old girl offend anyone? It's not as if anything else was showing, the dress she wore was sleeveless, but it has a high neck." Hannah had her first passport when she was three months old. Her mother and her father, Martin, realised that it was due to expire during their holiday later this month and decided to renew it advance.

They aimed to complete the application on Saturday, the same day that Hannah was to be Sheffield Wednesday football team's mascot at Hillsborough stadium. Mrs Edwards was also on call from her surgery.

After the rejection at the post office, Mrs Edwards spent two hours taking Hannah for new pictures, filling in a new form and finding the necessary "responsible citizens" to endorse the photos.

"The people who had signed the original application were not available," Mrs Edwards said. "I had to chase around and eventually found a neighbour who was a teacher to sign the pictures.

"The Passport Office should set this sort of thing out in its forms if it is going to be so pedantic."

A spokesman for the Identity and Passport Service said it was not its policy to reject applications with bare shoulders.

"The guidance set out on the application form doesn't include it, this picture should have been absolutely fine," she said. "If people follow those rules there should be no problem.

"The Post Office obviously has its rules and we can't comment on that. We are aware of a case in the past where an error was made involving similar circumstances, although I don't know the exact details. Staff should be aware of the rules."

A Post Office spokesman said: "Our offices have a Passport Office template which says what the photograph should and shouldn't be.

"Bare shoulders don't come into that at all. We can't see any instruction to that effect so all we can do is apologise to Mrs Edwards. It was clearly a mistake made by the clerk at the post office.

"It is the first time we have heard of such a rejection and we will take it up with that particular office.

"We do around three million passport applications a year. It is one of our most popular services and it is normally extremely effective.

"We have a much lower rejection rate compared to applications submitted directly to the Passport Office."


TOPICS: Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 21stcenturycrusades; dhimmitude; goatsex; ifthyeyeoffendsthee; islam; islamiclaws; islamiclunacy; islamism; islamonazism; itcanhappenhere; jihad; loonymuzzies; muslim; muslimsarelunatics; offendedmuslims; passport; passportphoto; pluckitout; sharialaw; whywefight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: aculeus

Kawai. Too bad she is growing up surrounded by such stupidity.

Preemptive dhimmitude. Excellent. I'm willing to bet a good sum of cash that NO Muslim complained about that pict, that some uptight lefty appeaser decided to six that picture on the possibility that it might give a Jihadi indigestion.

They do have a long record of never asking what the hell minorities really want and arbitrarily decide $#!+ on their behalf, like the good, arrogant pr!cks they are.

"OH you actually like sports team named after Amerindian tribes? Well too bad. The latest poll of braindead teenagers smoking weed shows that that's a racist thing and as your appointed liberal white guilt jagoffmeister we have decided that you are offended by such blatant intolerance. Now I must go pander to blacks by speaking ebonics even though "Jamal" is speaking in Queen's English."

If I were Muslim, I'd be fken insulted.

"YOu actually think that I'm that much of a brain dead, violent, pedo that I would riot over THIS PICTURE!? Eff you and the multiculti BS you rode in on! Grow some balls and stop kissing ISlamofascist @$$."


61 posted on 08/13/2006 9:50:55 PM PDT by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
So Muslims get their kicks from looking at the bare shoulders of pre-pubescent children.

Seems the problem. . .and the solution is all theirs.

Surely there is something in the Koran that corresponds to the Biblical admonition 'If thine eyes offend. . .pluck them out'.

If not there should be. . .it surely fits their sensitivites.

62 posted on 08/13/2006 10:14:09 PM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal free. . .or suffer their consequences. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

If this kid was wearing a belt loaded with explosives, however, it would be OK I guess.


63 posted on 08/13/2006 10:22:36 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
"Why are they going to France?"

Better weather and better food. Even if the French are such d-ckheads, some things never change. I'd say more attractive women too, but it was a traveling family so you know, of course, that no one in the family would notice ... ahem.

64 posted on 08/13/2006 10:57:31 PM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

The kid's obviously a slut. Off with her head! < /sarc>


65 posted on 08/13/2006 11:00:02 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (I wish a political party would come along that thinks like I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

She looks far more mature than those she would offend. And cute as a button, to boot.


66 posted on 08/14/2006 12:45:01 AM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Sometimes the bureaucrats that make these decisions to do everything in their power not to upset "sensitive" muslims are inscrutable as to what goes on in their heads especially when they seem to do everything in their power to disregard the sensibilities of almost all other religions. It seems that this approach does nothing but encourage the terrorist elements. We are telling them if you blow up our buildings we will proclaim Islam a "religion of peace", if you threaten us we will comply with even your most ridiculous demands.


67 posted on 08/14/2006 5:02:34 AM PDT by Maelstorm (The peace of slow poison offers no comfort to those who are left burying the dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

The UK is surrending in too many ways to Muslims. In fifty years the country will be dominanted by them and the UK as we have known it will have ceased to exist. Where is Winston when you need him?


68 posted on 08/14/2006 7:06:28 AM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Not saying it isn't all true, but...why am I thinking this photogenic cherub's mother is already listening to prospective agents who want to market her? A face like that could sell a lot of soap. Toys. Clothes. Cameras. Greeting cards...


69 posted on 08/14/2006 7:12:03 AM PDT by Graymatter (Don't like the PC, the lies, of the MSM? Don't watch TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
coming to a government near you..

Got that right. And sooner than they think if they don't wake up.

70 posted on 08/14/2006 7:17:09 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (...heavy strings, tune low, play hard and floor it. Floor it. That's technical talk....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Was the post office Gestapo of the Muslim persuasion perhaps?


71 posted on 08/14/2006 7:21:11 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

FGM does NOT offend the touchy Muslims. Putting sleeping bags on their women is part of their sensitivity. Etc.


72 posted on 08/14/2006 7:40:24 AM PDT by sine_nomine (President Bush: Build that wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
What a cute girl!

God forbid if Muslims are offended by normal western summertime dress.

Maybe we are getting a little offended!

Wasn't there a lady who raised a stink about taking off her veil for a passport photo?
73 posted on 08/14/2006 9:26:28 AM PDT by sasha123 (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

They WANT to convert us and impose Sharia Law in the west.

How clearly can this threat be enunciated??

And our GOVERNMENTS are collaborating with them.


74 posted on 08/14/2006 9:29:38 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sasha123
Wasn't there a lady who raised a stink about taking off her veil for a passport photo?

I know there was one over a driver's license.


75 posted on 08/14/2006 10:27:40 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (...heavy strings, tune low, play hard and floor it. Floor it. That's technical talk....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: oyez

She's practing for the next FL "Chad" counting contest.


76 posted on 08/14/2006 10:29:48 AM PDT by WKB (If I send you a blank reply that means I have nothing else to say to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Semi Civil Servant


great post!


77 posted on 08/14/2006 10:37:49 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Nothing about Islam suprises me.

In the days after 9-11, the Los Angeles Times reported on police surveillance
transcripts that the Italians made on Al-Quida operatives (well before 9-11).

After their "shop talk", the Islamics launched into a tirade about how
awful the Italian food was.

Hearing that simply cemented my opinion that Islamics are just in-freakin-credibly
NUTS!


78 posted on 08/14/2006 10:45:09 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Yep, that's kiddie porn alright! Shame on those lousy parents!
Good grief!


79 posted on 08/14/2006 10:46:52 AM PDT by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick

That was the situation! Thanks for posting her pic and the info. Just incredible, don't you think?


80 posted on 08/14/2006 10:48:14 AM PDT by sasha123 (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson