Didn't B92 used to be reliable until it was bought by Soros? Of course, I could be thinking of something else...
B92 is bought, lock, stock and barrel. It is not just owned by a foreign owner, its activity betrays a rather obvious provocative and disruptive agenda. It is a propaganda machine.
Typically, anything that smack of Serbian patriotism is equated to "extremism." The anti-Serbian (paid for) NGOs that operate in Serbia are always represented in positive light, the Serbian Orthodox Church in negative.
Its most recent flop was an exaggerated hysterical campaign to ban the Serbian Radical Party (SRS) because one of its members accused the current vice-premier of Serbia of belonging to a family, precisely her father an brother, of Croatian (Ustasha) extremists.
This was immediately labeled as "hate speech" and G17-Plus (another foreign interest group in Serbia, with only 3% of the popular vote) organized a campaign for banning SRS altogether because of a statement of one of its members! It failed when the Prosecutor General said there was no legal basis to ban the entire party.
This is the whole purpose of B92. It moves from one distortion to another. If you read its letters to the editor you'd wonder how did SRS ever get any seats in the Parliament, along with DSS and other parties, because judging from the letters everybody in Serbia is opposed to both! If you dare mention Soros, the letter will not be printed -- guaranteed!
One can get a clear picture of how B92 distorts the news from this example on the Papal wish to visit Serbia. According to B92 the Pope is coming to "unite the churches." This is clearly a fabrication when it is compared to the actual interview reported by Tanyug!
Such fabrication is carefully launched (and the sole commentary reflects that it worked!) to provoke negative responses to any Papal visit because I am absolutely convinced that Soros hates Christ and will do anything to cause hate and discontent among Christians. If he doesn't outright own B92 (I believe the owner is a German company), he probably owns the owner!
I repeat: B92 is an unreliable news source and should never be used as a sole source of any information.