Posted on 08/13/2006 10:13:29 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
Signed. This is outrageous.
Signed. Absolutely outrageous. A drug smuggler 'who had his rights abused' had to be tracked down by Homeland Security and given immunity to provide his testimony? This has got to be the only country in the world which would do such a thing.
ping
Thank you for this post and keeping the spotlight on this miscarriage of justice. I have signed the petition.
I read on another posting that it is possible that the drug dealer who was given immunity to testify against the US Agents may also be given US citizenship down the road. Any wonder why people outside the Beltway to not trust this government to structure a "comprehensive" illegal immigration plan.
This statement seems to indicate she wanted a conviction because she was like the Border Patrol. The fact is Border Patrol Agent are allowed to pursue suspects.
Interestingly enough all the Border Patrol Agents that have recently been caught smuggling or helping the cartels have recieved less jail time. Supervisors McClaren and Aviles from El Centro Sector were recently caught taken smugglers from detention and releasing them. They gave up names of agents and recieved hundreds of thousands of dollars. They were sentenced to five years, were allowed to keep their homes in exchange for restitution. These guys get ten years, yeah now that's justice /sarc.
An EPT (from which we cannot post) article on 8/10/06 mentions that Andy Ramirez, from the San Diego based Friends of the Border Patrol, will be testifying at the House immigration hearing to take place in El Paso Aug. 17 and plans to tell the story of the two border patrol agents.
Maybe then someone else will cover it?
I hear ya.. The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and Sara Carter and a few other rags and some at FR seem to be the only ones trying to get the word out.
BTTT
/jasper
FYI.......Lou Dobbs has been all over this case and has promised to continue helping these agents get publicity and hopefully some justice. The arrogance of these fed'l prosecutors over what should have been at the most most an administrative action is reprehensible.
I did find some interesting tidbits in the old El Paso Times articles. Ramos was offered various plea deals, but declined all of them believing he did nothing wrong. The last offer was to serve one year in prison and pay all of the drug smugglers medical expenses.
Those medical expenses were probably not small. While Sara Carter mentions only being shot "in the buttocks," the EPT reports at various times that his urethra was "severed," "ruptured," or "shattered" and had to be "rebuilt."
The defense also presented evidence that the drug smuggler was not hit in the back, as some allege (medical records showing the angle of the bullet's entry). The defense also attempted to expose other agents who had relatives or friends "on the other side of the law."
Not good (imo) for Compean, the EPT reported that he picked up only nine of his shell casings at first and later sent another border agent back to retrieve the other five. The agent testified that he threw them in a canal. Lots of covering up going on.
I'm glad to hear Dobbs is on it.
Something went very, very wrong here.
Doing their jobs? The agents shot the guy as he was running away (toward Mexico). They knew he was unarmed because he had already tried to surrender. When one of their shots finally hit the guy and he fell to the ground, the agents walked away. For all they knew, the guy could have been bleeding to death, but they just left him there and headed back north. Then they hid evidence of what happened and failed to report it. That's not their job.
Do they deserve 20 years?
btw, I saw the prosecutor on Fox last night discussing the case.
This is a lesson everyone can learn from.
If you're on a jury, NEVER vote against what you are absolutely convinced of.
Do not give in, do not back track, do not change your mind unless you are convinced by the evidence and the law, to the contrary.
Keep in mind, Jury Nullification can work, but the word needs to get out that the Jury is THE final judge on the law.
Signed and send the link and email to Burns, Rehburg and Baucus of Montana.
I don't know. What's the usual sentence for shooting a person? 20 years seems reasonable to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.