[nathanbedford]

I see this as leftists Seymour Hersh's preemptive strike to prevent the United States and/or Israel from striking against Iran's nuclear potential. The following alleged quotation is instructive:

the report quotes the former official as saying. "When the smoke clears, they'll say it was a success, and they'll draw reinforcement for their plan to attack Iran."

In my judgment it must be the principal foreign policy objective of the United States that Iran not obtain nuclear weapons. I would prefer that Israel strike rather than the United States but I suspect that Israel does not have the wherewithal to pull it off. Indeed, is not clear that the United States itself can with airstrikes alone wreck Iran's nuclear program. Putting boots on the ground is simply not an option.

Interestingly, Hersh's preemptive strike reveals volumes about the mindset of the left. They simply believe Bush is capable of any atrocity.

[Starrgaizr]

Hersh is pathetic. He wishes to sabotage US power. But I hope he is right. The president, however, must make the case for an invasion of Iran. Air attacks alone cannot be relied upon. It must be assumed that when Iran has nuclear weapons, it will use them. It is no different from letting Osama have nukes.