[Canard]

Um, well that's a completely different piece of my post than you quoted the first time and which I replied to your comment on. Although I'm still not sure how any of it would make me an islamofascist apologist or whatever it was.

As I said previously, my main point was to highlight some of the nuances of the political situation in the UK which seem to have escaped you, namely that the people that the article describes opposing Blair's view include some of his natural political allies and some peoples who are actually members of the 'government' who, as you say, are ultimately responsible for the security services who uncovered the plot. And that the views expressed are also held by a fair number of other members of his Parliamentary party.

Fine if you think that's asinine, in boldy print, don't bother replying or considering it. No need to get your knickers in quite such a twist though!

[One_who_hopes_to_know]

As I said previously, my main point was to highlight some of the nuances of the political situation in the UK which seem to have escaped you ...

It has hardly escaped me when the point of my post dealt directly with the culture in which these muslims operate.

The point of the post was that these muslims can not bring themselves to condemn the terrorist plot. Instead they condemn the government that caught the terrorists.

You pointed out that Blair's stance against terrorism is not wholly supported. This is the same dissembling, irrelevant, non-sequitor that these islamofascist appeasers use when they are called out for not condemning terorism. ... Thus, I called you a islamofascist appeaser.

If in fact you are not, I apologize. Perhaps you are just one of those people that posts whatever is running through your mind at the moment without thinking that you were employing the same tactic as other islamofascist appeasers. If so my apologies, and in that case I would only offer a suggestion that you think about the meaining of your arguments before posting.