Bush's language angers US Muslims (Media BARF Alert !)

BBC ^ | August 12, 2006 | Richard Allen Greene

[BIGLOOK]

He said it was wrong to link the actions of violent Muslims to their religion.

Historically, Muslims have been violent and all of their borders at war. We are seeing small enclaves of Muslims in England, France, Spain and the US and Canada plotting more violence. What are the 'moderate Muslims' doing about it......other than watching and claiming victim status in the news.

Road apples!

[ladyjane]

"BTW, one of my guys mentioned in passing that the lithium/detronium(?) can be used to make a radioactive substance? Anyone know? Those 1000 cell phones obtained by the ROP members picked up yesterday, the batteries are lithium aren't they?

Did you get any answers to your questions?

[gathersnomoss]

..."It offends the vast majority of moderate Muslims," Ahmed Younis said."

Offended Muslims offend me. Get the hell out of America. And for those who think this is hate speech, Get a Grip...Smell the Coffee...Get your head out of your @$$.

This world is changing even if Americans do not care to admit it. The 60's are over.

[gathersnomoss]

Open wide for Chunky. Bwahahahaha.

[maica]

Yeah,before GWB totally messed up the minds of the democrats all over the USA. The Belle Epoque of the nineties when Clinton's avoidance of all presidential behavior set the scene for the agony of our Global War of today.

[dragonblustar]

It's Oobi's cousin. : )

[processing please hold]

:-)

[Convert from ECUSA]

"They are upset about his use of terms like "Islamic fascists", which he used this week both for Hezbollah and the suspected bomb plotters held in the UK. "It offends the vast majority of moderate Muslims," Ahmed Younis said."



"The use of the term casts a shadow upon Islam and bolsters the argument that there is a clash of civilisations between Islam and the West," Mr Younis, the national director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (Mpac), told the BBC.

There is a clash of civilizations, and it was going on long before 9/11/01. There was a "shadow" on mohammedanism long before 9/11 and current events.

"He said it was wrong to link the actions of violent Muslims to their religion. "There is nothing Islamic about their fascism. The Prophet [Muhammad] and the Koran clearly articulate that this type of activity is outside of bounds for Muslims."

Well, then maybe some enterprising soul needs to edit out all the parts of the Koran that call for the murder of "infedels", the killing of Jews and Christians, and the idea that mohammedanism must take over and rule the whole world, one way or another. To say nothing of the whole idea that any "peace" with "infidels" is never truly peace, but only a temporary ceasefire until the mohammedans have enough strength to continue the "jihad". Sergey, you got it. Defnitely a pass-the-Pepto.

[Always Right]

They are upset about his use of terms like "Islamic fascists"

I agree, I don't like the term either. It is redundant.