Skip to comments.
Bush welcomes UN MidEast resolution
Reuters - washingtonpost. ^
| August 12, 2006
| Reuters
Posted on 08/12/2006 9:45:47 AM PDT by ImpBill
Edited on 08/12/2006 9:50:28 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
President Bush welcomed a U.N. resolution on Saturday aimed at stopping the fighting between Israel and Hizbollah, saying the guerrilla group and its sponsors Iran and Syria had brought an "unwanted" war to the region.
The fighting continued on Saturday, with the Israeli army saying it had started broadening its ground offensive in southern Lebanon.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; bush43; capitulation; ceasefire; islamofacists; unres1701; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: Mo1
Yea and that's why he put John Bolton in there ... get realYou ever hear of L.O.S.T.? If not, Bolton, Bush and Condi are perfectly comfortable giving the UN control of 70% of the Earth's surface.
21
posted on
08/12/2006 10:14:33 AM PDT
by
processing please hold
(If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
To: Darkwolf377
Oh to be sure, I am talking about "our" President, but in no way restricting my words and thoughts to him only.
22
posted on
08/12/2006 10:15:49 AM PDT
by
ImpBill
("America ... Where are you now?")
To: pbrown
23
posted on
08/12/2006 10:15:51 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: ImpBill
Speaking of which, before I became a Phillies fan, I'd get my wife to tie me up and flog me with a knotted rope. Now I just watch the Phillies.
24
posted on
08/12/2006 10:16:52 AM PDT
by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: Mo1
hahahaha What a come back. Prove my statement wrong. We'll see who's full of it then. I dare you to prove me wrong.
25
posted on
08/12/2006 10:19:29 AM PDT
by
processing please hold
(If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
To: B.O. Plenty
Oh I do believe GW has more than a clue over the nature of "our" (western civilizations) enemy. I just think possibly "political considerations" have robbed him of the cajones to do what will inevitably have to be done if "we" (in western civilization) are to prevail.
26
posted on
08/12/2006 10:19:32 AM PDT
by
ImpBill
("America ... Where are you now?")
To: Mo1
BTW, maybe you should change your tag line. :-)
27
posted on
08/12/2006 10:20:31 AM PDT
by
processing please hold
(If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
To: livius
Glad you feel that way and posted your thoughts in a cogent and amiable fashion.
We more than likely have more in common than not, but I have an entirely different take on this. But perhaps I am, due to age and past experiences, a bit jaded.
I, personally don't give a hoot about how "we look" and deeply believe that "we" have been squandering in many ways the chance to take this conflict of civilizations directly to our enemies directly by following the Military ancient and in recent histories ignorance of the "principle of mass".
If you are at all interested in the "principle of mass" as taught at the Army War College for many decades now you may read about them at the following link.
http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~madsb/home/war/fm1005/principles.php.
As in a "war" I participated in 30 plus years ago, we seem to apply them for a while and then back down.
What a waste of time and resources putting off the inevitable is and always has been.
28
posted on
08/12/2006 10:30:50 AM PDT
by
ImpBill
("America ... Where are you now?")
To: Mr Ramsbotham
LOL. Thanks. Repeat this from time to time, as I continue to respond to comments on this thread. It really helps in keeping all things in perspective.
29
posted on
08/12/2006 10:33:48 AM PDT
by
ImpBill
("America ... Where are you now?")
To: anyone
The ceasefire scorecard: Condi: on board; Bolton: on board; Bush: On Board; Chirac: On Board; Annan: On Board; UN Security Council: On Board; Hezbollah's Nazrallah: On Board;
Lebanese Prime Minister Saniora: On board; and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert: On board.
To: Mr Ramsbotham
Speaking of which, before I became a Phillies fan, I'd get my wife to tie me up and flog me with a knotted rope. Now I just watch the Phillies.
31
posted on
08/12/2006 11:01:17 AM PDT
by
Cobra64
(All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
To: pbrown
maybe you need to buy a clue
32
posted on
08/12/2006 11:01:29 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: Admin Moderator
Again I ask you in open forum, after a private response to restore this thread to it's original form. My post was not taken from the Washington Post, doesn't even have the same title. It was taken from Yahoo with the title as given and not the title "Bush phones Siniora on UN resolution" which the link you edited into my post carries one to.
Follow the link here http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060812/pl_nm/mideast_un_bush_dc_1and you will see it is not even the same article.
Is your job to protect Jim Robinson and Free Republic or to keep the thread as pro Bush/GOP as you can. Keeping folks from reading the news as found and posted?
It more than likely doesn't matter now as the thread is dead more than likely because you made the changes you did, to infer that it came from the Washington Post.
Sad day all around to include the free and open discussion here on Free Republic, even when done so in accordance to the rules Jim, so wisely, made after his problems with the Times and Post.
33
posted on
08/12/2006 11:02:26 AM PDT
by
ImpBill
("America ... Where are you now?")
To: Mo1
34
posted on
08/12/2006 11:04:30 AM PDT
by
processing please hold
(If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
To: ImpBill
The long lasting peace that Condi wanted.
35
posted on
08/12/2006 11:05:25 AM PDT
by
racing fan
(Go Team Israel!)
To: jamese777
The ceasefire scorecard: Condi: on board; Bolton: on board; Bush: On Board; Chirac: On Board; Annan: On Board; UN Security Council: On Board; Hezbollah's Nazrallah: On Board; Lebanese Prime Minister Saniora: On board; and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert: On board.So what's your point? Get back to us in a few months.
36
posted on
08/12/2006 11:09:07 AM PDT
by
Cobra64
(All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
To: coon2000
Bush is a buffoon. It is most clear to me now that this "War On Terror" is a total joke. Our best friend in the Middle East is fighting against a terrorist group that has killed hundreds of our own troops. Bush sends his Secretary of State in to save Hezbollah from destruction?
37
posted on
08/12/2006 11:12:09 AM PDT
by
FightThePower!
(Fight the powers that be!)
To: ImpBill
Then you should have posted that link instead of leaving it blank
To: ImpBill
You are probably right...but whether he doesn't know, or just doesn't have the political cajones will result in the same thing....which is getting a lot of us killed.
There is something about great power that I clearly do not understand...and just what it is that would keep a powerful man from doing what he know is the right thing to do.
I just pray that when the car bombs start going off here, it is not at our table....but if it is....we'll never know, will we?
39
posted on
08/12/2006 11:34:06 AM PDT
by
B.O. Plenty
(Islam, liberalism and abortions are terminal..)
To: B.O. Plenty
40
posted on
08/12/2006 11:40:58 AM PDT
by
ImpBill
("America ... Where are you now?")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson