Skip to comments.
Lamont campaign criticizes Lieberman for comments on terror plot
WTNH Television ^
| 8/12/2006
| Puppage
Posted on 08/12/2006 6:06:18 AM PDT by Puppage
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: Sooth2222
LOL! I'm afraid to look up the word "elastricator".
21
posted on
08/12/2006 6:29:34 AM PDT
by
RedRover
(Boot Murtha! www.irey.com)
To: Puppage
Lamont spokesman Liz Dupont-Diehl says... Lieberman can speak for himself. Why can't Lamont?
22
posted on
08/12/2006 6:31:32 AM PDT
by
airborne
(Fecal matter is en route to fan! Contact is imminent!)
To: Puppage
Democrats' steadfast refusal to support the War on Terror is proof they've marginalized themselves as the party of Cindy Sheehan and the loony left.
23
posted on
08/12/2006 6:31:52 AM PDT
by
FreeRep
To: RedRover
The Terrorist Tip Sheet endorsed LamontYa know, I never was one for a paper endorsing anyone. I mean, how can there be objective reporting when a paper endorses one candidate over the another?
24
posted on
08/12/2006 6:32:48 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Puppage
I am one of probably 3 people in the state of CT who actually know his name. Not only do I know his name, I've played blackjack with him. Just kidding. But, you're right, he doesn't stand a chance. A year and a half ago, I said, after Lieberman chastized his fellow democrats for demanding apologies from US authorities for the Abu Ghraib thing and not from the terrorists, that I might actually vote for him. Now it appears that I may have to since the vote for the republican could hand the seat to a left wing antiwar loon.
25
posted on
08/12/2006 6:37:15 AM PDT
by
ChuckShick
(He's clerking for me...)
To: Puppage
I mean, how can there be objective reporting when a paper endorses one candidate over the another?
Agreed! Fortunately, the Times' endorsements mean little if anything (except to send a bias alert).
26
posted on
08/12/2006 6:37:48 AM PDT
by
RedRover
(Boot Murtha! www.irey.com)
To: Puppage
It just seems to me that Lieberman needs to leave the Democrat Party officially. He'd be a RINO, but the Democrats have shown their true colors.
My liberal-leaning friend is dismayed by what the Democrats have done to Lieberman. But, then, I think she's the same kind of centrist Democrat that Lieberman is.
27
posted on
08/12/2006 6:40:40 AM PDT
by
Clara Lou
(A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. --I. Kristol)
To: ChuckShick
that I might actually vote for himI am so far to the right of Leibermans politics, but his support of efforts that protect America from terrorists trumps all else IMHO, which is why I plan to (gulp!) vote for him in November.
28
posted on
08/12/2006 6:41:48 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Puppage
Lamont and the Muslims think they are going to control freedom of speech in this country. Not likely!
29
posted on
08/12/2006 6:43:02 AM PDT
by
abclily
To: Puppage
I'm going to have to gulp before I vote for him as well. I have both philosophical reasons (he's a lib to the core) and personal reasons (he railroaded a friend when he was AG), so it's going to be a bitter vote.
30
posted on
08/12/2006 6:56:07 AM PDT
by
ChuckShick
(He's clerking for me...)
To: Puppage
Comment from Lamont.......terror plot, what terror plot, just President Bush playing on our fears!
/s/
31
posted on
08/12/2006 7:03:38 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: MAD-AS-HELL
spokesshrillLOL! That's awesome.
32
posted on
08/12/2006 7:13:06 AM PDT
by
Darkwolf377
(http://www.dansimmons.com/news/message/2006_04.htm)
To: Puppage
You know, I'm REALLY lovin' how the hapless cut and run libs totally come unhinged at the slightest mention of anything to do with national security and their weakness in this area. They know the coming elections will be all about the safety and security of America and her people and they are desperate to change the focus. Every time a terror operation is busted up, every time a terror suspect is arrested and everytime that nut bag president of Iran, Alamabajabbadine or whatever the hell his name is, shoots off his mouth, the left cringes.
Forget the biased polling and use common sense. If there is no security, if we cannot be safe within our own borders then nothing else matters. The instinct for survival is the very strongest we possess and people will remember that when the walk into the voting booth.
To: avacado
well you missed there oped where they endorsed lamont(sanford and sons)
34
posted on
08/12/2006 7:43:45 AM PDT
by
italianquaker
(Democrats and media can't win elections at least they can win their phony polls.)
To: Puppage
This Lamont character is in the Demo-proto-islamo-fascist wing of the party that thinks the Middle East is best improved by removing Americans and Jews from the area.
Time to send him back to his investments.
35
posted on
08/12/2006 12:51:25 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Puppage
And complete withdrawal out of Iraq will make us safer? How's that?
36
posted on
08/12/2006 12:55:23 PM PDT
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: Darkwolf377
Yes, I think he'll self destruct, too. Of course, I've known that ever since I found out he was Corliss Lamont's great nephew (Lamont's father is also named Corliss, but the famous wealthy Commie Corliss Lamont was his great uncle).
37
posted on
08/12/2006 12:56:49 PM PDT
by
livius
To: ChuckShick
I'm going to have to gulp before I vote for him as wellMaybe we should form a support group? LOL
38
posted on
08/13/2006 5:43:35 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson