Lamont campaign criticizes Lieberman for comments on terror plot

WTNH Television ^ | 8/12/2006 | Puppage

[RedRover]

LOL! I'm afraid to look up the word "elastricator".

[airborne]

Lamont spokesman Liz Dupont-Diehl says...

Lieberman can speak for himself. Why can't Lamont?

[FreeRep]

Democrats' steadfast refusal to support the War on Terror is proof they've marginalized themselves as the party of Cindy Sheehan and the loony left.

[Puppage]

The Terrorist Tip Sheet endorsed Lamont

Ya know, I never was one for a paper endorsing anyone. I mean, how can there be objective reporting when a paper endorses one candidate over the another?

[ChuckShick]

I am one of probably 3 people in the state of CT who actually know his name.

Not only do I know his name, I've played blackjack with him. Just kidding. But, you're right, he doesn't stand a chance. A year and a half ago, I said, after Lieberman chastized his fellow democrats for demanding apologies from US authorities for the Abu Ghraib thing and not from the terrorists, that I might actually vote for him. Now it appears that I may have to since the vote for the republican could hand the seat to a left wing antiwar loon.

[RedRover]

I mean, how can there be objective reporting when a paper endorses one candidate over the another?

Agreed! Fortunately, the Times' endorsements mean little if anything (except to send a bias alert).

[Clara Lou]

It just seems to me that Lieberman needs to leave the Democrat Party officially. He'd be a RINO, but the Democrats have shown their true colors.
My liberal-leaning friend is dismayed by what the Democrats have done to Lieberman. But, then, I think she's the same kind of centrist Democrat that Lieberman is.

[Puppage]

that I might actually vote for him

I am so far to the right of Leibermans politics, but his support of efforts that protect America from terrorists trumps all else IMHO, which is why I plan to (gulp!) vote for him in November.

[abclily]

Lamont and the Muslims think they are going to control freedom of speech in this country. Not likely!

[ChuckShick]

I'm going to have to gulp before I vote for him as well. I have both philosophical reasons (he's a lib to the core) and personal reasons (he railroaded a friend when he was AG), so it's going to be a bitter vote.

[OldFriend]

Comment from Lamont.......terror plot, what terror plot, just President Bush playing on our fears!

/s/

[Darkwolf377]

spokesshrill

LOL! That's awesome.

[Eagles Talon IV]

You know, I'm REALLY lovin' how the hapless cut and run libs totally come unhinged at the slightest mention of anything to do with national security and their weakness in this area. They know the coming elections will be all about the safety and security of America and her people and they are desperate to change the focus. Every time a terror operation is busted up, every time a terror suspect is arrested and everytime that nut bag president of Iran, Alamabajabbadine or whatever the hell his name is, shoots off his mouth, the left cringes.

Forget the biased polling and use common sense. If there is no security, if we cannot be safe within our own borders then nothing else matters. The instinct for survival is the very strongest we possess and people will remember that when the walk into the voting booth.

[italianquaker]

well you missed there oped where they endorsed lamont(sanford and sons)

[muawiyah]

This Lamont character is in the Demo-proto-islamo-fascist wing of the party that thinks the Middle East is best improved by removing Americans and Jews from the area.

Time to send him back to his investments.

[marajade]

And complete withdrawal out of Iraq will make us safer? How's that?

[livius]

Yes, I think he'll self destruct, too. Of course, I've known that ever since I found out he was Corliss Lamont's great nephew (Lamont's father is also named Corliss, but the famous wealthy Commie Corliss Lamont was his great uncle).

[Puppage]

I'm going to have to gulp before I vote for him as well

Maybe we should form a support group? LOL