[saveliberty]

Given the secrets that the NYT chose to expose, even if only for communication, why wouldn't the terrorists want tons of disposable cell phones?

[ndt]

"Given the secrets that the NYT chose to expose..."

If a disposable phone has a life of say 20 hours (I'm making this number up as I don't know) wouldn't you expect a guy to buy a phone a week if he was a heavy talker? I'm not seeing anything here that says they were trying to buy 100 of the things. I'm just wondering what makes it suspicious circumstances.

[callthemlikeyouseethem]

multi-purpose weapon... There is evil lurking amongst us...

[antivenom]

LOL considering the democrats weak postions leading up to the elections...we might actually be witnessing Howard Dean and his cronies at work! LOL!!!

[Charles H. (The_r0nin)]

Given the secrets that the NYT chose to expose, even if only for communication, why wouldn't the terrorists want tons of disposable cell phones?

Bingo! As I also suggested in this thread, these phones might not be detonators at all. They could very well be the terrorists' attempts to circumvent the surveillance that the NYT clued them in on. These phone purchases are PROOF that the NYT is helping the terrorists! They show the terorists are changing their tactics after learning about US methods through the MSM. This is something that needs to be spread, so that as many people understand it as possible. It's a direct connection between the NYT's leaks and terrorists' changes in tactics...