Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sam_paine; little jeremiah

"as compared to what?"

As compared to..... not being colonized. Duh!

"As compared to the perpetually un-industrialized path it was on?"

How do you assume it would have remained "un-industrialized". Even Japan, Germany, Italy, Russia and the US were "un-industrialized" in the period prior to the British colonisation of India and embarked on industrialisation quite late. Far later than England, France, Spain or Portugal.


36 posted on 08/11/2006 10:25:28 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Gengis Khan; little jeremiah
How do you assume it would have remained "un-industrialized".

Just letting results speak for themselves.

Either:

A - India was strong enough to defend herself and evolve on its own as a world player

-or-

B - India was susceptible to forced colonization (rape, pillage, etc) and she was damn lucky that the British Empire was there other than some other conquerer.

Again, as you point out with Japan, Germany, Italy, Russia....better for freedom and prosperity to be manhandled by Britain or British ex-colonies than otherwise.

38 posted on 08/11/2006 10:38:18 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson