Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right_in_Virginia

Why would the US sign on to a resolution that counters everything it stands for in the war on terror?

Anyway, to steal a phrase from the gay activist lobby, if we had been "loud and proud" in our support of Israel from the beginning, Olmert may very well have done things in a different manner. I agree that Olmert is a bit of a coward, but I do think he wanted to do the right thing. He was just too scared of the international pressure (and pressure within his own political party) that comes from doing the right thing. His personality reminds me a lot of Justice Kennedy. We knew who we were dealing with when the war first started. I think we should have tailored our public responses to provide Olmert with the support he needed to justify a tough war.

In any event, I stand by comments I've made elsewhere that we need to get out of the UN. It does us very little good and every time we try to make nice with Russia, France, or China, they just come back to stab us in the back.


1,753 posted on 08/11/2006 3:15:34 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1724 | View Replies ]


To: NinoFan

HE's brand new. We couldn't know what he would do. We gave them every opportunity to take the fight to the enemy. He bungled it. He's an embarassment to his people and the world. I could just spit, I'm so disgusted. You don't leave your people behind. You don't start a war and then accept a cease-fire from without. THis was a WASTE. Nothing gained.


1,802 posted on 08/11/2006 3:43:40 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Yalla yalla yalla, send you back to allah, screw you inshallah, along with hezballah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1753 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson