1 posted on
08/10/2006 8:10:54 PM PDT by
SmithL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: abb
2 posted on
08/10/2006 8:11:21 PM PDT by
SmithL
(The fact that they can't find Hoffa is proof that he never existed.)
To: SmithL
To: SmithL
Charles Johnson of LGF was really hoping that the scandal would not be dubbed "Reutersgate." I guess he'll be disappointed to learn that the standard _____gate template has been utilized.
4 posted on
08/10/2006 8:14:07 PM PDT by
Cyclopean Squid
(Being That Guy so you don't have to.)
To: SmithL
Some claim that the online controversy over the photos has gotten out of hand, with many blogs now launching investigations and hurling accusations at a variety of news sources. where Some = MSM outlets
5 posted on
08/10/2006 8:16:16 PM PDT by
FourPeas
(when it comes to binary, there are 10 kinds of people: those who get it and those who don't)
To: SmithL
To: SmithL
7 posted on
08/10/2006 8:17:39 PM PDT by
weegee
(Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
To: SmithL
"These accusations can be very damning, and need to be handled with care and not thrown out by any angry blogger," Grin!
Ain't life great? The left is sliding a little further into senility. Ain't life grand?
8 posted on
08/10/2006 8:18:26 PM PDT by
Balding_Eagle
(God has blessed Republicans political enemies who are going senile.)
To: SmithL
In The New York Times photo essay "Attack on Tyre," a photograph of a man who appears dead is accompanied with the caption reading "bodies were still buried under the rubble." However, in a later photograph in the same series, the same man appears to be walking in the foreground of a photo. The Times issued a correction for the first photograph, stating that the man was injured. "He was injured." Sounds like a hell of an injury if he was up walking around afterwards LOL. So what's the theme? "Evil Israelis cause man to stub his toe on the corner of a building."
To: SmithL
We have Al Gore to thank for the internet:)sarcasm intended
11 posted on
08/10/2006 8:20:21 PM PDT by
Thombo2
To: SmithL
To: SmithL
Oh, no! It's a vast right wing conspiracy...to uncover the truth.
15 posted on
08/10/2006 8:23:04 PM PDT by
aligncare
(Reporter ignorance killed journalism)
To: SmithL
16 posted on
08/10/2006 8:25:39 PM PDT by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: SmithL
Read a silkily condescending excepted article from the WaPo on here this week (can't find the link) about how LGF had achieved "a success of sorts" in these Fauxtography matters.
This, from the paper that's been resting on its Nixon Impeachment laurels for over 30 years.
It made a point of indicating the Charles Johnson is actually a professional musician, not a professional journalist.
But it conveniently failed to address:
- how it is that a professional musician is doing the editorial work that Reuters should've done; and
- how many other biased/inaccuarate/faked photos and articles were treated as "truth" before the rise of the Internet & bloggers.
To: SmithL
The fact that the online community rather than fellow mainstream media has become a watchdog of accuracy has surprised many who originally derided blogs as being "devoid of accuracy." Bump to the NEW media!
19 posted on
08/10/2006 8:30:59 PM PDT by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: SmithL
"these accusations can be very damning, and need to be handled with care and not thrown out by any angry blogger," said one anonymous poster on Little Green Footballs. BWAHAHA,These accusations ARE damning and indefensible unless you are a dishonest person or organization(as we all know they are).
LGF is a great blog.
21 posted on
08/10/2006 8:34:13 PM PDT by
X-FID
(Calm up and clam down.)
To: All
Looks like the UN may be taking action against Israel based on the 'ACCURACY' of the fake pictures:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1681610/posts
UN Human Rights Council to convene on Israel
Now I can't help but wonder if any of these photographers were acting on a grant from the HRC???
24 posted on
08/10/2006 8:47:24 PM PDT by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: SmithL
Back in the early fifties, SERUTAN (nature spelled backward), a supplement, used before and after photos of blood cells. I cut out the two pictures and shifted the after up and to the right and overlayed it on the before and they were the same. Bogus photos are not new.
25 posted on
08/10/2006 8:49:59 PM PDT by
orchid
(Defeat is worse than death, you have to LIVE with defeat.)
To: SmithL
"These accusations can be very damning, and need to be handled with care and not thrown out by any angry blogger," said one anonymous poster on Little Green Footballs.
Oh! Really?
Would that be in the same way the MSM "handles their damning accusations with care"???
Huh?
28 posted on
08/10/2006 9:13:19 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: SmithL
Is it any surprise that those who routinely twist the news would alter pictures to suit their needs? It is great that a whole legion of people are out there to act as a quality control mechanism for the media.
29 posted on
08/10/2006 9:19:41 PM PDT by
Ma3lst0rm
(Trust when money is involved is better described as foolishness.)
To: SmithL
The proverbial
30 posted on
08/10/2006 9:35:44 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson