Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I included the closed-caption transcript in the original post.

Those sentences are the whole exchange? Oh come on, if that's all there is, there's nothing.

Here is my paraphrase of Williams's comment:

Our enemies have proven their willingness to die for their cause, but we have extraordinary warriors on our side who are willing to die to stop them.

Enough of this nonsense.

58 posted on 08/10/2006 7:53:02 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: TChad

It's always possible, of course, that Williams was only attempting to comment on the assumption that those on both sides have people who feel they are acting bravely, despite the relative causes, and that he didn't mean to directly compare the causes themselves and raise them to the same level of legitimacy and importance. To be fair, it wouldn't be too far out of the question to give Williams the benefit of the doubt on this one.

But, that he would so quickly wish to somehow prove that Jihadists are also "brave" in that they are willing to give their lives to their causes is, in itself, disturbingly close to also equalizing their cause to legitimacy and "goodness" -- whether he wanted to or not.

After all, how "brave" is it to give your life for an evil cause?

Let's face it, in our society one equates giving your life for your country to the highest form of bravery. And that bravery is used in a positive context, as opposed to a negative one. So, Williams' positively denoting a Jihadist's willingness to give his life for his cause would, in general parlayence, reflect that said Jihadists are also brave. This would lead one to an assumption that the cause that one is dying for is also worth being brave for!

So, sadly, Williams seems to see no difference between the bravery of our soldiers and emergency services personnel and that of those who would die for those 72 virgins. And, if he so quickly imagines that Jihadists are also brave enough to die for their cause then we cannot escape the conclusion that he either sees neither cause (the Jihadist's or ours) as any better one from the other, or he really DOES think both causes have the same legitimacy.

Either way, his sense of moral judgment is in doubt at this point


59 posted on 08/10/2006 7:54:40 PM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: TChad

Yea, IF ONLY HE HAD SAID THAT!!

The point, tho, is that he didn't!


60 posted on 08/10/2006 7:56:15 PM PDT by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: TChad

Where were you at 7:05 p.m. tonight..........LOL.


62 posted on 08/10/2006 7:59:19 PM PDT by Howlin (Pres.Bush ought to be ashamed of himself for allowing foreign countries right on our borders!!~~Zook)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson