Skip to comments.
Flying? New TSA Carry-On Baggage Rules
http://channels.isp.netscape.com/whatsnew/default.jsp?story=20060810-1252 ^
| 8-10-06
Posted on 08/10/2006 10:54:02 AM PDT by Hydroshock
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: Hydroshock
TSA makes all passengers fly nake and clear plastic travel bags must be used....
To: Hydroshock
everyone should fly naked. but then we will have to go thru a floroscope to make sure a bomb hasnt been surgically implanted. i cant see an end to this yet there isnt really a good answer.
3
posted on
08/10/2006 10:57:07 AM PDT
by
APRPEH
(visit my profile page to donate to Israeli charities)
To: Hydroshock
I think a lot of people are just going to stop flying until they implement some sanity with respect to screening of passengers!
4
posted on
08/10/2006 10:57:26 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: Hydroshock
I've only flown once since 9/11 and its not because of fear of terrorists - its because the security makes it no longer worth it to fly any place I can possibly drive to.
I'm not showing up three hours early for a two hour flight.
5
posted on
08/10/2006 10:57:33 AM PDT
by
gondramB
(We will have peace, when you and all your works have perished and the works of your dark master)
To: APRPEH
6
posted on
08/10/2006 10:57:36 AM PDT
by
Hydroshock
( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
To: Hydroshock
New TSA rules...
Ban everything except passengers that look like this guy.
To: Hydroshock
This is just a plot by the airlines to prevent those of us who have had bad checked-bags experiences, from carrying our bags on board.
They want the opportunity to loose/damage/destroy more luggage.
8
posted on
08/10/2006 10:58:37 AM PDT
by
grobdriver
(Let the embeds check the bodies!)
To: Hydroshock
Contacts may be brought on board in their cases, but the cases cannot contain liquid. How the hell do you do this?
To: Hydroshock
Fly naked, no carry-on. Problem solved!
10
posted on
08/10/2006 10:58:59 AM PDT
by
Disambiguator
(Don't mess with Israel.)
To: Hydroshock
I travel from Indianapolis to Mississippi about seven or eight times a year. For the last five trips, we've driven (10 hours) in a rented and fully-loaded minivan. In fact, any trip under five hours and I drive.
If you count travel to and from the airport, waiting and checkin times, and all that other crap, the drive is worth it.
And we stop in at Dreamland (Tuscaloosa) every time we pass it ;)
11
posted on
08/10/2006 11:00:24 AM PDT
by
SJSAMPLE
To: Hydroshock
Ugh. As usual, this will result in *more* deaths. The increased time and inconvenience will cause travellers on the margin to drive rather than fly, which is far more dangerous per mile.
To: gondramB
I would stand in line for any number of hours to visit my kids.
Hadn't flown in about 20 years prior to 9/11 but I sure wasn't going to expect my kids to risk their lives flying home to visit family. We began flying to visit them.
Don't care how inconvenient it is......our family flies.....all the time. To europe and within the US.
13
posted on
08/10/2006 11:00:44 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: gondramB
its because the security makes it no longer worth it to fly any place I can possibly drive to.
Same here. Its not so much that the security takes long - its that you can't forecast how long it will take, so you have to take the worst-possible-case scenario, and arrive based on that, then sit captive in the airport.
Last time I flew, between the waiting and the flights (Cleveland<->Dallas), I went through three novels, three magazines, and I slept for half the flight.
.
To: OldFriend
My daughter in law has a 9 month hold. How are you supposed to travel on a plane without a bottle?
15
posted on
08/10/2006 11:04:45 AM PDT
by
sharpee
To: vox humana
Ban everything except passengers that look like this guy. And anybody whose name contains the letters "a.k.a."
16
posted on
08/10/2006 11:05:24 AM PDT
by
wyattearp
(Study! Study! Study! Or BONK, BONK, on the head!)
To: sharpee
"My daughter in law has a 9 month hold. How are you supposed to travel on a plane without a bottle?
"
Reading is FUNdamental. Had you read the article at the top of this thread, you'd have seen that baby formula is one of the exceptions.
Since you did not read the article, you came to an incorrect conclusion, causing me to waste some time explaining it to you.
17
posted on
08/10/2006 11:08:19 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(non-evangelical atheist)
To: Hydroshock
What an f-ing joke. Guess I'll just drive when I have to travel on business.
18
posted on
08/10/2006 11:09:57 AM PDT
by
Doohickey
(I am not unappeasable. YOU are just too easily appeased.)
To: sharpee
I wonder if this ban includes stuff like Preparation H. Could be uncomfortable for some people. ;)
If they are not allowing any beverages then I hope the airlines will either start giving out small bottles of water, or even selling some right at the gate. I hate to board without it.
19
posted on
08/10/2006 11:10:39 AM PDT
by
TNCMAXQ
To: TNCMAXQ
"I wonder if this ban includes stuff like Preparation H. Could be uncomfortable for some people. ;) "
It does include Preparation H. I suggest applying it before going through security.
20
posted on
08/10/2006 11:11:41 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(non-evangelical atheist)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-151 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson