Posted on 08/10/2006 9:32:35 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
Picky, picky, picky.
OT: what is that ridiculous frilly garment worn by the young lady? Am I the only one who remembers a time when safety concerns meant that all that loose ragged fabric would not be allowed around equipment in a shop? Just waiting to read that her garment has been caught up in the lathe.....
You're supporting the UN global warming mantra and calling me a fifth columnist! ROFL!
I'll never forget. My hair came out of a pony tail and got caught in a lathe. I had a battered skull, a 1 1/2 inch bald spot on the top of my head, and a headache for a week. And I was lucky!
Yeah, your deceit pretty much proves it. I don't support the UN global warming mantra. You lied again, so what? Nobody is surprised. I did say I must trust my chief executive to make the best choice for the state, or sumtin like that.
No lies, grunt.
You said you trust the chief executives who chant the global warming nonsense to do the right thing. Those executives are seeking to impose new regulatory hurdles on the state. Ipso facto, you support the mantra.
You go to any length to betray the truth. I said, " I must depend upon the chief executives". And if you wanna ipso facto I'd also have to depend on your philth if he were elected. I'll take Arnie, thanks.
Backwards. You're the cheerleader for the left.
Oh, Sheesh! I am so sorry! Yes, I said that you "trust the chief executives ..." instead of you "depend upon the chief executives".
My apologies! I can see the HUGH difference between the two phrases! /s
(The only thing being betrayed here is logic--and conservatism--and it ain't me doing the betraying!)
And if you wanna ipso facto I'd also have to depend on your philth if he were elected. I'll take Arnie, thanks.
The question was not about Arnie or Philth--it was about proposed Global Warming regulations that would be in force for longer than either will reside on earth.
Nice T-shirt. lol
I'd accept them if I thought they were sincere. They aren't and you were just looking for more division.
Your continued deceit neglected to quote the word 'must'. When I say "I must depend" that means I have no choice. That means I would have to depend on whomever the chief executive was, even your boy Philth. Like I said before; I'll prefer Arnie. You're a disruptor, using false quotes and feigning innocence, betraying republicans is your thing.
More lies and insults from grunt--and NO reply to THE QUESTION.
What a cop out!
Hey disruptor, what lie?
I count at least 5 lies in your post.
Here's the thing, grunt. I don't believe that we are required to follow any politician. I believe all politicians work for the people. As such, I don't accept any position as a done deal and don't believe that I "must trust" anyone. In fact, I don't trust any politician.
What we have is a group of liberals and leftists trying to push a global warming carbon trading scheme. That group includes Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Arnold Schwarzenegger, John Doerr and the Kleiner Perkins vulture gang, the NRDC, RFK jr, and a host of others.
The scheme is opposed by the Chamber of Commerce, the California Manufacturers and Technology Association, all Republican legislators, and a host of other Republican and Conservative groups.
I side with that opposition. And you?
Any laws passed are in place a whole lot longer than any politician. When the discussion gets limited to a single politician, instead of the issues of the day, the only ones that lose are the people.
Must be the effects of global warming or that piece of wood did not come off of a lathe.
Do it then, divider, count 'em. Give me a chance to reinforce each point.
I answered the question in #56. I don't trust any politician, either. I also don't trust anonymous posters suggesting a vote against the republican candidate. In your continue to say 'must trust' in your misquotes. You feign innocence as you pretend to not understand between 'must trust', and 'must depend'. That even includes that communist agent, xlinton, and the Philth you'd love to see win. You betcha there is a huge difference in the words. You know, you twist them often. You're clear that you side with the opposition to Arnie. 'Nuff said.
IT'S NOT ABOUT ARNOLD
Sure, whatever you say ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.