Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedumb2003

Chertoff is just now outlining the "no liquids carried on" policy. Wouldn't it be smarter to have a "no Muslim passengers" policy?


105 posted on 08/10/2006 5:09:28 AM PDT by thelastvirgil (Incumbent politicians: PUBLIC ENEMY NUMBER ONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: thelastvirgil

Shoe bombs, liquid bombs, carry on bombs. The bloody jihadists are laughing all over the planet.

HOw long will it be before we start searching up people's butts?

You could have a liquid explosive up your butt! Full body cavity searches for ALL!! (Except young middle eastern men, that would just be wrong, plus they'd be lining up for blocks, clogging up the whole works). I hope to God I don't need a sarc tag here.


156 posted on 08/10/2006 5:42:52 AM PDT by subterfuge (If Liberals hated terrorists like they hate Bush the war would be over by now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: thelastvirgil
Wouldn't it be smarter to have a "no Muslim passengers" policy?

I have said, over and over again since 9/11/01, that all citizens and subjects of Islamic countries who cannot PROVE that they are doing work here of vital national security interest should be interned and then deported.

It was true then, it's true now, and it will be true tomorrow.

219 posted on 08/10/2006 6:27:24 AM PDT by Jim Noble (I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit - it's the only way to be sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson