Posted on 08/09/2006 12:48:53 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
Brilliant!
Personally, I wouldn't want to take credit for such a piddly turnout.
Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) boards his campaign bus after voting in the democratic primary in New Haven, Connecticut, August 8, 2006. (Brian Snyder/Reuters)
They will have their "Pogo Moment" come November.
U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-CT, smiles while talking to reporters in his Hartford, Conn., suite Wednesday afternoon Aug. 9, 2006. Lieberman was defeated by Ned Lamont for the party's nomination Tuesday night. (AP Photo/Bob Child)
The Dems casting out of Joe Lieberman is pretty interesting. At this moment, we
have three young democracies with elected leaders (Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon)
standing up against Islamo-fascism (with the help of western powers). Say what
you will, but you can certainly see a strategy here. 5 years ago, no
democracies in these countries, today three democracies.
Do the Dems truly and seriously want to throw all this hard work away? If not
the young democratic governments, who would the Dems support in the Middle East? The Taliban in Afghanistan, The Sad'r Malitia in Iraq, Hexbollah in Lebanon....?
Casting out Joe Liberman without an actual coherent alternative plan was a huge
political mistake in my opinion.
Let see they WIN a fight over a guy that votes with them 90% of the time in a Democrat voter only Primary?
Love watching the Stupid Leftists eat their own.
The left is way past anger, they are hateful & intolerant!
It wasn't the Internet, it wasn't activist, it was Karl Rove.
And despite all the angst and bombast they managed to win by less then 6,000 votes. Pretty pathetic showing no matter how hard they spin it.
Of course there is no mention of THE FACT that is was Joe's own rotten Dems who sank him...and they say it was the bloggers. Total BULL ^&*%. They threw "moderate Joe" over the side years ago.
It surely was. But 'Rats excel at those :)
In three months how will they explain they won the primary but lost still by majority vote to an Independent Lieberman?
What message should that give to the Democrat party regarding their stance on the war?
I'm going to laugh my self silly if Joe comes back on the Independent ticket and wins.
What a maroon. Does he think a blue-blood born-into-riches elitist like Lamont is really looking out for the common man? Give me a break.
Well, the Moonbats finally won one
Like shooting your own hunting dog to claim that you "got one", but....
Priceless. Liberal DEMs most 'significant victory' is vanguishing their own party's former VP candidate. REPUBS could never have removed a Liberman but the RATS got it done.
If only they could win some more victories as sweet as this one.
Look out John Edwards--your next. Oh wait--John Boy does not even have an office to lose.
Well then surely Bill Richardson or the the RAT Indiana senator can get the Liberman treatment shortly just for posturing to be included on the RAT ticket.
--
So will Joe.. ;-)
ap
Well, the big question should be:
"Should republicans welcome Joe Lieberman to their party, knowing full well he will be a RINO?"
Is that like BS on steroids?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.