Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross
So you are still left with the most clear evidence of a relationship...and its bloody recent. Not ancient history.

I think I understand. When the dollar goes up, there is no relationship to the trade deficit. When the dollar goes down, of course the decline is caused by the trade deficit.

Is that the logic you're using?

319 posted on 08/14/2006 3:43:38 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
When the dollar goes up, there is no relationship to the trade deficit.

Nope, just that other factors are temporarily masking and indeed overwhelming the core fundamentals. When China buys U.S. treasuries and other debt, it isn't because they need a place to park the money and realize a bigger return than elsewhere...if they wanted a bigger return...there is no better place for them to put their money than in their own country. Just ask the outsourcers.

Using the principle of Occam's Razor, the best explanation is state interference...simply that they needed to prop up the dollar as part of their currency peg operations, and this was an optimal method.

The continual and accelerating drag on the dollar's value represented by the accelerating trade deficit to China and its intermediaries [call it the force of gravity] , is neutralized vis-a-vis China by their state bank interference. This allows the dollar valuation to be more directly influenced by other, perhaps less tangible, factors. Hence, the U.S. dollar was freed to rise, with the drag being neutralized, by normal investment flows, or governmental inflationary/deflationary behaviors, or even as the beneficiary of being a transhipment point for Chinese production, with middle-man profits tacked on... and so on.

That is all that happened. But absent the neutralization against the drag...it could not have happened.

A possible driving factor that could overwhelm the postulated masking effect of state interference, explaining the falling dollar against the basket of major currencies, would be the extent to which China's intermediaries who tranship China production into the U.S., and cut out the U.S. as the middleman, (this would also include European manufacturers now outsourcing to China to better compete against the U.S. middleman) have their trade surplus burgeon...while not pegging. Their currencies would rise, and eventually impact all non-pegged currencies that trade with them... including the major currencies in the basket relied upon for the measure.

328 posted on 08/15/2006 6:47:20 AM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson