Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross

The chart was REAL wages i.e. wages after inflation is factored OUT. NOMINAL wages increased even more.

Another economic concept you need to understand is the difference between real and nominal.


220 posted on 08/10/2006 9:46:53 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]


To: justshutupandtakeit
The chart was REAL wages i.e. wages after inflation is factored OUT.

Roooight. Using Xlinton's CPI.

222 posted on 08/10/2006 9:53:31 AM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

To: justshutupandtakeit; Toddsterpatriot; Paul Ross; expat_panama
Help me out here with my figures: the graph I posted in my #170 shows an approx. 9% increase in real wages from 1994-2004. Is this correct?

Now, help me again: if inflation is being understated to the degree Paul Ross suggests (let's say everybody out there is simply treading water), then that 9% should be added to our average 10 year inflation rate. So let's say the "true" inflation rate is 9% + 3.5% = 12.5% (is 3.5% the proper figure? help me).

Wouldn't that mean that consumer prices have more than doubled during this ten year period (as everyone's treading water), and no one but Paul Ross has noticed?

DISCLAIMER: The views contained in the above comment do not represent a working familiarity with mathematics.

235 posted on 08/10/2006 11:16:32 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson