[1rudeboy]

I didn't follow his link, which would have only further proved him wrong because it dealt with recovery from the recession rather than an across-the-spectrum numerical analysis.

You wouldn't have one of those laying about, would you? I mean, an "across-the-spectrum numerical analysis?" Here is mine, suitably titled, "The Real Story on "Stagnant" Wages." Sorry you feel "misdirected." I'm hurt.

[1rudeboy]

And I forgot, how does providing data from 1991 onward deal only "with recovery from the [presumably 2001] recession?" Did I misdirect you that badly?

[nopardons]

bttt

[Paul Ross]

So according to your own charge from '94 to '04 wages went up less than a dollar an hour in ten years...and yet the costs of most everything such as houses and food has easily more than doubled...