To: ZGuy
Sun appears to be above them and behind them (2 coordinates, not 2 suns). Also the wall is affording some shielding of the light source.
The lighting appears that it could be genuine.
14 posted on
08/09/2006 7:57:12 AM PDT by
weegee
(Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
To: weegee
The lighting appears that it could be genuine.
Just one problem: the gun doesn't have any bullets in it. There is no magazine attached. Guns without ammunition don't shoot.
53 posted on
08/09/2006 8:09:00 AM PDT by
JamesP81
("Never let your schooling interfere with your education" --Mark Twain)
To: weegee
Sun appears to be above them and behind them (2 coordinates, not 2 suns). Also the wall is affording some shielding of the light source. The lighting appears that it could be genuine.
Also, photographer could have used a flash (yes, even in broad daylight) to fill the shadows. The closer subject, with the rifle, would be more strongly lighted by the fill flash. This can sometimes cause slightly strange looking photographs; they look like bad photoshop jobs but aren't.
60 posted on
08/09/2006 8:11:32 AM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson