To: COUNTrecount
On a more serious note. I have it on good authority that the Washington Post took photoshop off their photographers' laptops and replaced it with photoshop elements in an attempt to limit what they could do in the field.
20 posted on
08/09/2006 6:59:48 AM PDT by
MediaMole
(9/11 - We have already forgotten.)
To: MediaMole
Just curious... those were all legally purchased and registered versions of the Adobe software, right?
22 posted on
08/09/2006 7:02:53 AM PDT by
pointsal
(Q)
To: MediaMole
On a more serious note. I have it on good authority that the Washington Post took photoshop off their photographers' laptops and replaced it with photoshop elements in an attempt to limit what they could do in the field. A photographer who doesn't own a copy of PS isn't worthy to be called a professional. It's as essential a tool in digital photography as a camera and lens. The WaPo may dictate what is on their company laptops, but there is no way in which that would limit their photographer's access, if desired at any time.
25 posted on
08/09/2006 7:23:09 AM PDT by
LexBaird
("Politically Correct" is the politically correct term for "F*cking Retarded". - Psycho Bunny)
To: MediaMole
They would loose is curves and the ability to use plug-ins.. Still can use the clone stamp tool and layers. I use PSE 4.0 myself.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson