Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Iscool

When would you have shut dow our largest oilfield to replace the pipeline? Just curious as to when the optimun time would have been


37 posted on 08/08/2006 6:37:24 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Figment

Replacement should be an ongoing process. Build a one-mile bypass pipe and replace the main line. When that section is complete, move the whole operation down the line and work on the next mile of pipe.

Doing it that way can't be any more expensive than the amount of money BP claims to be "losing" every day the corroded line is shutdown. It's called common sense and planning.

If any of this BS was truly on the level, every BP employee and manager in charge of maintenance and upkeep would be replaced. This is a dog and pony show to keep pump prices jacked up.


41 posted on 08/08/2006 7:13:29 PM PDT by NorthWoody (Hey, politicians! Stand up, be men, do your jobs and close the borders while there's still time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Figment
When would you have shut dow our largest oilfield to replace the pipeline? Just curious as to when the optimun time would have been

I would suspect this crude goes into, or has the capability to go into storage tanks somewhere along the line...I assume that would have been part of the initial planning stage to compensate for any maintenance operations...

A scheduled repair would be far less costly in downtime compared to shutting down and replacing the entire piping system...

46 posted on 08/08/2006 8:02:20 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson