Replies

Look at it this way. If this were the mid 1940s and you and I were having the same discussion (via snail mail or something - aargh!), I'd be advocating the elimination of nazism (suspect you would agree with me on that) *not* necessarily the elimination of all Germans. Even though we won that one, nazism still exits unfortunately but no longer as the threat it was. Did some women and children need to die to defeat that ideology? They sure did.

Many (I'm among them) see what has been occurring and feel that islam is a far greater threat even than nazism was. That threat needs to end. I'd *love* to believe that just bombing the snot out of a few cities and killing a few key people can end this threat. Unfortunately, I think the reality is going to turn out to be that civilization can not be safe from the ravages of 'radical' islam until all of islam is gone. Is 'radical' islam distinguishable from non-radical islam? I don't know, but I'm afraid not.

I'd be tickled pink to learn that I'm wrong about that. Time will tell.

I recall seeing pictures of muslim children dressed in dynamite jackets. And there were a few female suicide bombers, too. This is not the time nor place for "diversity" or political correctness. This is life or death. Them or us.