It is still child porn. Why would this be different than any child porn n the internet with "pretend " actors?
It is porn if it shows a child being raped or in provocative sexual scenes..doesn't matter if its "acted" or photshopped. So..... as long as an "artistic " small film company puts out the film...it is now not pornography?
as for the parents, they don't give a hoot about this child...they know, money or not, she will be even more in demand for the money films after this outrage.
She's the hottest child actor around who doesn't need more publicity. They probably have visions of an Oscar.