Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I could be wrong, but I think the problem here is that this seems to not be done for the purposes of character development, but done for the purpose of titillation.
There are plenty of ways to film a scene in such a way that these issues wouldn't come up, so I'm unsure why the director wouldn't want to err on the side of making this less exploitive of the child, unless the exploitation was the goal.


110 posted on 08/07/2006 9:05:44 PM PDT by chae (R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero He lied, he cheated, he stole my heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: chae
I think the problem here is that this seems to not be done for the purposes of character development, but done for the purpose of titillation.

Doesn't matter to me what the purpose is.

You got a 12-year-old doing a nude or semi-nude realistic rape scene.

That ain't right, on many levels.

And it appears that it may fall within the legal definition of sexual exploitation of a child.

124 posted on 08/08/2006 11:44:21 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (I ha' da Steve Nash DO befo' Steve Nash DID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson