Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Borges

Should all unpleasant matter be depicted?


100 posted on 08/07/2006 8:40:11 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: stands2reason

Like I said earlier, you have to earn the right to depict it by dealing with it seriously.


101 posted on 08/07/2006 8:42:13 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: stands2reason

Should all unpleasant matter be depicted?




It pretty much has been in the history of art. The only thing that keeps folks from being outraged about it is their lack of education.

Figure Saturn ate his own children...for starters.


103 posted on 08/07/2006 8:47:43 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: stands2reason
Should all unpleasant matter be depicted?

When there are no standards, pretty much anything goes, under the guise of "art" and "tastefully dealing with dreadful subject matter."

Equivocation is the new norm.

109 posted on 08/07/2006 9:01:20 PM PDT by Thumper1960 (Politicians are like diapers. They need changed often, and for the same reasons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson