Posted on 08/07/2006 5:22:47 PM PDT by wagglebee
Wichita, KS (LifeNews.com) -- Pro-life advocates who purchased a building that formerly housed a Wichita, Kansas abortion facility say they have employed chemicals normally used to investigate crime scenes and found the walls of the room where abortions were performed completely covered in unseen blood.
Members of Operation Rescue, a pro-life group that purchased the former Central Women's Services abortion business building, conducted blood trace tests.
The group decided to test various surfaces and walls inside the building, which has remain unchanged since the pro-life group purchased it in June. The abortion business occupied the facility for 23 years.
Using a substance called luminol, a reagent that brightly glows in the dark when it comes in contact with even minute traces of human blood, the pro-life advocates found the walls to be blood soaked.
“The walls looked like there had been a chain saw massacre in there,” said Cheryl Sullenger, one of three people to conduct the tests. “We couldn't believe our eyes. We were absolutely shocked.”
She said that blood and other bodily fluid "simply flies during an abortion and that stuff all soaks into the dry wall and gets tracked into the carpeting where it putrefies."
In a statement obtained by LifeNews.com, Sullenger said that would explain the foul smell that permeates the building.
"There is no way to get rid of it aside from major demolition. From what we observed, there can be no such thing as a ‘safe, clean’ abortion clinic," she said.
Sullenger also said the smell and the results of the chemical tests were worse in a room where a massive garbage disposal was used to pack up the remains of an unborn child for disposal. The sink was used to wash the parts of the machines used to do abortions.
“It was a shop of horrors,” said Sullenger.
Last month, the group took members of the media in Wichita on a tour of the building.
Reporters from the Associated Press, WIBW-TV, and the Wichita Eagle newspaper were taken through each room of the former abortion center and shown the shoddy conditions, including out of code plumbing and utilities.
“They all seemed to understand that this abortion mill needed to close,” said Sullenger. “Most of them seem genuinely shocked by what they saw.”
However, in three articles written by reporters who attended the viewing, general references were made to the shoddy conditions inside but not of the very brief news reports described the problems at length or Governor Kathleen Sebelius' veto of bills that would provide for better inspections and regulation of abortion centers.
Kelly Simpson, former president of Central Women's Services, blamed the shoddy conditions on the moving of everything out of the building and indicated that none of the women going there for abortions every complained about its cleanliness.
The Central Women's Services abortion business will not likely reopen anywhere else and the rights to its name and web site were sold to George Tiller, who operates a late-term abortion business in Wichita.
Abortions were done twice a month at the time the abortion facility closed and Central was doing about 350 to 400 abortions each year.
The pro-life group has planned to do extensive renovations on the building and turn it into a memorial for unborn children who died there and a headquarters for the organization.
I assume your comment is directed to raybr, not me...
So there you have it then. The slaughterhouse must have been clean.
Abortionists have been known to "process" dead babies through garbage disposals. This isn't your pediatrician's office.
"I've seen babies aborted -- we had one that was so big it wouldn't go down the disposal."I've met her. She's a very reliable witness.
--Carol Everett
It's not a "medical environment," it's a slaughterhouse.
It started in 1992, when two Charleston abortion-clinic workers went to the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control with a horrific tale.Do a search on "abortion + garbage disposal" and see what you come up with.The doctor for whom they worked didn't just abort babies-he ground their tiny bodies in a kitchen garbage disposal, flushing what was left down the drain and into the public sewer system...
"There's more regulation now in a veterinarian's clinic than an abortion clinic," McConnell said in launching hearings into the matter. During those hearings before the General Assembly in 1994, women told what they saw while undergoing abortions: bloody sheets, bloody cots, dirty bathrooms- even a dog in the operating room. The bill that emerged from those hearings- proposing to regulate abortion clinics' sanitation, staff qualifications and disposal procedures-was signed into law in January 1995.
See #85.
The blood most likely comes from poor sanitation, which abortuaries are notorious for.
However, I understood raybbr to mean 3 acquaintances..
....not 3 women he knew on a personal level.
Yes she is!
I think they ought to burn it down. That would be the only way to be rid of the pervasive stench of pure evil.
Maybe raybbr would like to illuminate us ~
According to the first sentence of the article, it was a special kind of blood covering the walls - UNSEEN blood.
Thanks, but I keep it in my pants. Try to direct your comments to the right person, rather than slandering me; thanks.
Everybody is now in agreement that you were not the target.
In any case, glad to hear you are behaving yourself.
According to the first sentence of the article, it was a special kind of blood covering the walls - UNSEEN blood.
"I read once where aerosolized urine can be found on all surfaces at distances up to 15 feet in front of a properly functioning standard toilet."
That would depend entirely on how many men live in the house.
;)
That's a pretty hideous, but accurate, comparison.
Really? Which pro-life groups are you referring to?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.